Boarding a plane in Moscow in the early morning, we left a harvest moon in our wake. For Yasik transitioning from a Russian social setting to a social setting in a western Canadian family and urban community was a transition from life on the moon[i] to what? The image of the moon seems apt enough. Barren and life limiting. Wildly different from what we believed we were inviting Yasik to share with us in our family and community. Promise of a chance for a good life.
A young judge proclaimed Yasik our son from now on because his bio-parents had neglected him. Conventual wisdom tells us how amazing we are for adopting a little waif. We need to remember that resume building for sainthood is also a rap sheet for the sins of the first parents, as “flawed and unworthy“. The child becomes a “lucky-adoptee” and the parents with whom the child will always carry some connection, are endlessly brought to mind with a whiff of lessness. “This causes a split in the [adoptees] hearts and minds that’s very painful.”[ii]
Building a new mindset about family
Yasik left behind an understanding of family that led him to say “I have a poppa and momma now.” After knowing us less than 24 hours. Dave carried him into the Vancouver airport with no moon hovering. An extended family greeted him as he was whisked into a community with a van, a house and lots of toys. “In one day, these children become part of well-educated, affluent, stable and loving families”.[iii]
I’ve said in earlier posts that Yasik left the orphanage with nothing other than what we provided. Not quite true. His strabismus had not been accommodated. And in time we would find that he struggled to keep up in the classroom. Was this because at the orphanage staff were stretched to find time to sit and chat with a little kid or answer the ‘Why?’ questions of a three-year-old?
Yeah but, No but … let’s shake off the clutches of an apocalypse. We humans, however we are packaged, have flexible minds and bodies. While Yasik remains seldom the talker in most groups, he has always found ways to adapt.[iv]
Maybe the orphanage staff read stories of families to the children; maybe he saw the parents of other social orphans drop by. Maybe he had some idea of poppas and mommas. He certainly seemed ready to embrace a family setting.
As far as we could tell, our setting as parents was not consciously hierarchical or paternal. Dave and I thought of ourselves as partners, forming a nuclear family. Yasik chinked into that assumption when almost from Day 2, he assigned us the traditional roles, taking ‘Nyet’ from Dave, cuddling into me. We wondered if such a role assignment was wise – but for whatever reason, in the journal – as a 3rd day parent- I write “we want to argue roles but they are still there; why did he assign roles that way? We may believe we have a more liberal or sophisticated view of Ma and Pa in parenting but it would appear we are building on ancient structures that remain part of our thinking”. Did Yasik want us to maintain some image he had of a papa and mama? Or maybe it is simply some personality vibe we gave off and he responded to for, though I cannot be certain, from two years old to life with us, his caregivers were likely all female, allowing for little opportunity to see how the male role played out.
What does this mean for single parents or same sex parents? Do they too have to work through some pre-conceived image the child has of parental roles? Almost from the start Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption 2nd ed.[v] begins to consider this question.
My earliest journal entries note that Yasik’s explanation of his story showed that rather quickly he began working on his story, developing his mindset. While he thought he came from the moon, he would for a time also refer to his arrival in Canada as “when I was born”. He told us that there are kids who come from mom’s tummy and kids who are picked kids. But at the same time, because he knew I could not have any more kids and we have to assume he was hoping for a sibling, he suggested that maybe Dad could have a girl. At other times he said he liked being an only child. The one certainty is that we cannot deny he had family narratives for relationships on his mind from almost the beginning.
Being four and half at the time of his adoption, he knew he was different, that parts of him belonged to someplace else. The other kids in his class had narratives of life with their parents before kindergarten. No surprise then when that one question belonging only to non-biological families, the ‘real’ parent issue, came up rather early as well, so we talked.
One day he made it clear that he was aware of his differences from his buddies with the blunt and direct, “You aren’t my real parents.” Another time he asked where some part of his being (whatever it was, I didn’t record it) came from in him and then said, in a tentative manner as though uncertain whether to say it or not, that this part must have come from his ‘real’ parents. I wonder where he picked up the term ‘real parents’?
There were no blatant physical differences between Yasik, Dave and I as Susanne Antonetta has experienced with her Korean born son, but the baseline experiences of the ‘real’ parent issue are the same. I will paraphrase some of her experience with ‘The Question’ and then encourage you to read make me a mother.[vi]
Around the same age that Yasik was beginning to piece a narrative of his story together, Antonetta’s son, Jin, was also working out how he came to be. It was hard for Jin to accept the story, though true, but the explanation was given to him in an age-appropriate narrative: “For him, it’s hard to understand being flown somewhere to be given to two strangers, however good everyone’s intentions.” But for the most part initially Jin did not seem to be giving too much thought to his adoption says Antonetta although she wondered if he “struggled with something I could not put my hands on to fix.”
Antonetta and her husband did follow one of the top ten guidelines for adopters: Be open about the adoption; answer your child’s questions. She adds something interesting to this advice: Because her son had heard that babies come from mommies’ tummies, she thought her son likely “heard the story with the coda of the tummy belonging to another woman”. When Jin was eight, he began to ask about his bio-mom, telling Antonetta that thinking of her made him feel sad. He told her he thought it was unfair that he didn’t even know what she looked like.
Antonetta’s response was likely the response of most caring adopters: “I hadn’t expected it all to be so hopelessly confusing”. She sought to draw him closer but sensed his uncertainty, however vague.
One particular instance of the awareness of difference that tends to call up a sense of lessness came when she and Jin were playing together at a park. Antonetta had gone for her bag and returned to where Jin was playing to find him being questioned and taunted by some young boys. Seeing her ‘Caucasianness’ and his ‘Asianness’ they asked why Jin was with her and then asked if he was an orphan, following the question by then throwing the word “Orphan!” at him. Antonetta had been expecting to deal at some point with the question of adoption and the differences that come with it, but she was unprepared for it happening in an arena of being bullied for the differences. Jin actually thought the bullies would not have made a scene if they had not seen the racial differences between herself and her son. She says of the experience:
He was in a rage at me. He couldn’t forgive me for having been with him, for being who I was. He cried and repeated that I should have just stayed away from him, all the way home. I hurt for him. I hurt in a way that ripped me apart….
To bridge or help Yasik as he built his own narrative, Dave told Yasik of his own adoption and then told Yasik he has a bio-brother, bio-sisters and a bio-parent set. Dave explained that probably money problems are why his bio-mother left him in the orphanage. Dave then reaffirmed that Yasik was all ours and we were his now. We also talked about the orphanage, telling him all of the scant story as we knew it then. About all we could do at the time was to be sure that the questions were answered as satisfactorily as possible hoping that he still felt secure. At the time I wrote: “Some [of that sense of security] can’t happen – he is divided but may it never destroy his spirit”. And when you think of what I have just recorded from Susanne Antonetta’s book, you have to wonder how Yasik was receiving the narrative we were presenting to him.
Of course, being a kid, he used the narrative too at times. Dave had a shift and was juggling, just once I might add, getting a babysitter for Yasik. He responded by becoming frustrated and obstinate, saying to me, “Why is it parents are meaner to kids who have a different beginning and come from a different place?” Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents suggests feelings like this may come from the fear of losing another parent and advises against too much daycare until the child has a sense of security within the family.[vii] So let me repeat in our defense, our memory is that we called in a babysitter once for our disgruntled son.
Building a new mindset about community
Yasik not only had an active part in setting up our family setting, he also, as a school-aged child, led us into most of our social engagement outside of family. We three were Caucasian, each with at least some eastern European genes; Dave and Yasik are males and I am a female; Dave and I are Canadian born and Yasik is naturalized. Yasik and I have a large age difference but Dave and Yasik are fairly appropriately spaced. Dave and I, with some post-secondary education, were working to hold on to a yet tenuous grasp of the middle class. These parts of each of us fit us into certain societal slots. We would want to find a social setting that would accommodate our comfort levels. Or so you would think. Yet we were almost irrevocably part of a community based mostly on the decision to buy a house within our means found for us by a realtor who was the son of a friend of our friend. He showed us two houses: this one looked cuter than the other. Decision made. We dove into the community pool of life in our little neighbourhood.
Yasik was learning to swim in this community pool guided from the pools edge by teachers, coaches, music teachers, parents of buddies, friend of ours. Each was impacting his environment, influencing his spirit, mind and body in not only big ways, but often in almost imperceptible ways. Yasik and I were watching a video sent home with him from school about a snowman who takes a little boy and flies away with him to a snow land. Yasik said, “Mom I didn’t know snow persons could fly”. I almost corrected it to ‘snowman’ and then realized he’d been taught to be politically correct.
Yasik’s community school was a block away and most of his classmates lived within walking distance of the school. Day upon day, walking him to school we came to know the other mothers, fathers and caregivers walking his classmates to school. First a tentative nod, then a ‘Hi.” And then “Hey, can Yasik come over to play?” and the doors were swung wide open to our little community. We signed him up for the T-ball and soccer clubs. Some of his classmates were on his team. Quite naturally, these kids became his playmates and standing on the sidelines or waiting for the kids after school, the kids’ parents became our playmates. The thing about these social relationships is that they are most often ad hoc. There is little to no opportunity to review resumes, ensure that we are leaving our child in the best of hands, filtering out characters or the impacts of characters who may not share all of our values.

Via school and neighbourhood, Yasik made buddies. For parents this can be a two-edged sword. Yasik loved to play with the kids, free time for us. I suppose a ‘Yipppee!’ and ‘Goodie!’ might have erupted from time to time in our thoughts as friends begin to tip the scale in their favour over time with parents. One year in a DIY bid, Dave bought a pair of clippers and gave Yasik a buzz cut – I think the one and only, but visions of dollars saved were dancing in Dave’s head. Yasik looked like a miniature Dave, but big whoop. After the cut, Dave told Yasik to go look in the mirror. Yasik looked and let out a mighty wail. “Dad, nobody will know my name”. Sooner than an adopter of an older child might want, attachments were expanding and shifting.
Meaning there are negotiations to be made. It could be said interacting in your community is learning to swim in life’s community pool. Mostly it was fun to be with the kids, but it meant struggles too. Each of us parents benefit by the de facto babysitting but we are uncomfortable with our child being watched over in play over by another parent who may have no problem with yelling at the kid or smoking around them, or with seeing our child bested by another. We may want to helicopter parent when letting well enough alone leads to growth in confidence. It is a gamble between stepping in to fight our children’s battles or holding our breath and allowing them to work it out on their own. For the most part we let Yasik work it out, checking on him after the fact.
At Yasik’s eighth birthday I noticed him laughing that covering, defensive, too loud laugh he used when his two main buddies bugged him and he got upset and rightly so. One of the two would needle just to get a rise (in fairness the little needler was dealing with family issues too). I asked Yasik how he felt about it and he said it got him, so I said, “Just laugh.” (Duh, that is what he was doing) and then he said, “It gets in my head” – meaning it made him angry before he could stop it. I was impressed with his self-awareness.
And while these encounters may have started a learning process in relationships, I do think for Yasik, already aware as an adoptee that he perceived himself and was perceived by those around him as different, the kind of lessness Jin felt was also being developed. Hidden Daughter-Secret Sister, Bitterroot: a Salish memoir of transracial adoption and Monstrous: a transracial adoption story [viii]all speak to the sense of differentness and lessness. Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies[ix] calls it a “sense of separateness“. (If these suggestions are not enough, then my page Sources offers a good number more books with this message).
I took Yasik and his buddies to Lazer Tag one evening and Yasik – though no one expected it when they should have as he often did so – got the highest scores. He shot people well. In a group including adults he came in second and the young braggarts in his group came quite last. He was that way in baseball too – consistently doing well – not in fits and spurts of glory. At the end of one season in soccer Yasik got carried off the field like a somewhat shocked but very happy hero. Yet the myth of his lessness persisted.
While playing lacrosse after school with The Two, Yasik’s primary buddies, the ‘who-gets-to-be-on-which-team’, a learning hurdle so many children have to face, became the lesson of the day. Number One as usual took the lead in choosing whom he saw as the better players, first inserting himself in the important position. Yasik would not contend the setup, slipping immediately into second place but mentally focusing on his anger or hurt or revenge and seeking to get even. In this case, checking in frustration, not Number One, but Number Two in an unfair way. I made Yasik stop immediately and took them all home. Number One ran to tell his dad with Number Two following. I assured the father I was dealing with it but before I had begun meting out punishment, Yasik stepped forward to apologize to Number Two of his own volition. Number Two, always a peace maker, returned the apology, maybe realizing that because Number One had to head to hockey practice now, they would only have each other to play with.
The ‘who-gets-to-be-on-which-team’ lesson surfaced again for Yasik the next week at school. Yasik was faced with the ignominy of once again not being chosen for the favoured team. Whatever revenge Yasik sought to enact, when Dave came to pick him up at school, he was told Yasik had been made to ‘stay after school’. We all know what that phrase means. Dave went to the classroom to get Yasik. Upon seeing him, Yasik started crying hysterically. The school authorities figured he had been punished enough. Talking it over later that evening, Dave and I decided he had too much competitive tension and wanted the school to redirect him from Mr. Number One, Mr. Number Two and Mr. Number Three triangles. He was handling his pressures with explosions, and we were hoping to show him alternatives. In a social circle of great importance to a school-aged child, one that encompasses after-school playtime, soccer teams and social interaction between the adults attached, it is difficult to find other options, factoring in that these kids see each other as each other’s best options for great times together.
Still the question: Is it such a big deal? Jennifer Traig cites a study that found that siblings argue 3.5 times per hour, 80% of the time over toys. (Incidentally, and likely part of being in Phase VI on child development registers – joining in and finding my place-, parents get to be the issue only 9% of the time).[x]
Julie Lythcott-Haims, in How to Raise an Adult: break free from the overparenting trap and prepare your child for success[xi] says
Sometimes kids are bullies…. When bullying happens, kids need parents and other advocates to help them disentangle themselves from it and recover….
A definition of …True bullying — intentionally disempowering or isolating individuals and systematically demeaning and hurting them over a period of time.
But as Susan Porter wrote in Bully Nation, in a lot of situations we parents label something a bullying incident when it’s a normal passage through child development and socialization…. Porter encourages parents and educators to avoid the bully label and instead help children develop the resilience needed to handle the harsh social challenges of life.
(Incidentally, Alexander McCall Smith, in The Sweet Remnants of Summer, Chapter 8, offers a nice example for how to handle the tricky uncertainty of fault assignment in children’s squabbles.)
Yet, via bullying or not, if a sense of lessness becomes a worm embedding in a child’s already weak sense of self, then what?
The idea of lessness (it is tempting to suggest the term ‘marginalized’) was also fertilized by adult opinion. Yasik had listened in on enough conversations to know he was different in his birth narrative, in his shortness, in his struggles with learning. And at times it got capped off by adults like his soccer coach who, Yasik’s skill to the side, wouldn’t let him be goalie because of his height, again letting him know he was coming up short (I couldn’t let that one go).
As I note in Set and Setting: social, first Russia as early as four years old, children have begun to recognize the false beliefs in others’ messaging[xii]. While it seems Yasik’s mindset around family had to find accommodation for two families, his mindset around community was making use of the awareness of false belief. For whatever words came out of the mouths of those around him, he believed they saw him as less. And his reactions in these moments clearly state that he felt that was both wrong and unfair.
Footnotes
[i] He is a Person www.adoptionasfamily.org
[ii] Easterly, Sara, Kelsey Vander Vliet Ranyard, Lori Holden Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies Rowman, 2023, 40
[iii] “Orphanage experience alters brain development”
W News, University of Wisconsin-Madison, February 17, 2003 https://news.wisc.edu/orphanage-experience-alters-brain-development/
[iv] IBID
Human Rights Watch “IV. THE “GILDED CAGE” OF THE DOM REBYONKA: INFANCY TO FOUR YEARS” https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/russia2/Russ98d-05.htm
[v] Hicks, Stephen, and Janet McDermott Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption 2nd ed. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2018
[vi] Antonetta, Susanne. make me a mother: a memoir. WW Norton, 2014, 135-142.
[vii] Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002, 34.
[viii] Mooney, Kim Hidden Daughter-Secret Sister Austin Macauley, 2020, 23
Harness, Susan Devan Bitterroot: a Salish memoir of transracial adoption University of Nebraska Press, 2018
Myer, Sarah Monstrous: a transracial adoption story First Second, 2023
[ix] Easterly, Sara, Kelsey Vander Vliet Ranyard, Lori Holden Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies Rowman, 2023, 60
[x]Traig, Jennifer Act Natural: a cultural history of misadventures in parenting Ecco, 2019, 180.
[xi] Lythcott-Haims, Julie How to Raise an Adult: break free from the overparenting trap and prepare your child for success Holt Paperbacks, 2016, 23,24
[xii] Hare, Brian and Vanessa Woods Survival of the Friendliest: understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity Random House, 2020, 57, 89












