Author: admin

  • Defining and Distilling Authoritarian Parenting Style

    Was our disciplining an attempt at intentional Authoritarian parenting or just wing-it threat and bribe?  Does the following set of definitions connect dots?[i]

    Δ   Cold: low responsiveness, aloof and distant, affection is given sparingly, if at all; boundaries are maintained between parent and child.

    Δ      Demanding/Unbending: strict, making non-negotiable rules, not considering the child’s needs or desires, “My way or the highway”, accompanied by harsh criticisms on making mistakes, or the more PC, emotional manipulation.  The child’s strong will must be broken.

    Δ     Control: to foster obedience and implement discipline.  Parents monitor child’s behaviour, activities inside and outside the house.

    Δ     Punitive discipline/highly negative consequences often justified as “tough love”: threatening, beating, spanking, thrashing, pulling, pricking, kicking, punching, and emotional punishment like neglect, yelling, scolding for not doing things “right”, silent treatment, stonewalling.

    Distilling Authoritarian Parenting

    Apparently, orphanages in Russia unapologetically chose Authoritarian parenting as a pragmatic style given the economic chaos of the 1990s. It was explained as ‘toughened attachment’,[ii] considered necessary to prepare the orphans in their care for the harsh world they would be turned out to at the age of 18.  Hopefully these children would be toughened enough to deal with the economic struggle and the need to get along in such a world.

    … [The] philosophy of toughened attachment is characterized by the understanding that the best forms of attachment behavior are non-responsive. The rationale is that non-responsive care trains children to be resourceful and thus increases their chances for survival in bleak times…. -namely, a relationship whereby children from an early age could be taught to best maximize opportunities in resource-lean environments. In particular, detdoma workers encouraged children with very limited economic prospects to make multiple, flexible, and peer-based relationships with others….

    Such attachments were socialized in a variety of ways, including swaddling (thought to encourage self-soothing), delaying responses to child crying, encouraging children to ask peers rather than adults for help when they had problems, or telling children in consciously cheerful or humiliating ways, to discover the answers to questions on their own somewhere in the orphanage. Throughout this process, those children who were compliant and cheerful about such interactions were rewarded verbally or by being given some important status or role in the orphanage, although not with touch. Those children who did not comply and expressed anger, sadness, and despair were discouraged using the socialization techniques…

    We may have begun to parent a child already brewed in Authoritarian parenting. We do not know what Authoritarian parenting meant on a daily basis for Yasik but the article above suggests it is possible Yasik was being nurtured with “toughened attachment”.

    We do know that when meeting us for the first time in the little waiting room of the Yaroslavl orphanage became too stressful for Yasik, he turned to the sweet doctor and folded himself in her arms, arms that willingly accepted him, letting him sob into her neck. But did that moment speak to the orphanage’s daily parenting style? Did Yasik know it was safe to turn into the little doctor’s shoulder as a security he knew he could trust or was the moment meeting us so overwhelming he took the first outlet available. Certainly the woman at the desk and the woman who brought Yasik into the room were not stepping in: out of shyness, uncertainty or the expectations of ‘toughened attachment’?

    Whatever parenting he experienced, he would have learned ways to respond. If his early experiences of parenting were traumatic or at least authoritarian, then the way he expressed his frustrations to our discipline may have been techniques he had learned to defend himself when receiving ‘toughened attachment’. Or maybe his responses were defenses against what his imagination understood about having a mama and papa.  Did that mean to him that life would be different from life in the orphanage; he need not suffer discipline and insecurity anymore? Or, as the honeymoon period receded into the hurley-burley of everyday life, did some of our parenting seem to him just like ‘toughened attachment’?

    We, even in the West, are not immune from it.  Traditional parenting or ‘Trad parents’ check off authoritarian definition boxes above.  It starts with the assumption that small children are capable of manipulating their parents – a sign, I guess not of a clean slate within but of some kind of willfulness – and that effective disciplining must incorporate some pain. [iii]

    To quote a response to that one: “The truth is that children aren’t capable of manipulation until adolescence, because to be able to manipulate, you need a more developed prefrontal cortex.”[iv]

    Be that as it may, Authoritarian parenting is also seen as a wise choice among working class parents who know that to be good employees, children need to know how to be obedient and develop a strong work ethic.  Some also see that at times Authoritarian parenting helps when children are falling into bad company and making choices that will hurt their future.  It might also be an interventionist tool when a child veers off course, choosing friends that take the child on a path away from education and healthy lifestyle choices. But studies have shown that the outcomes of authoritarian parenting can produce children with low self-esteem and self-doubt, turning to peers for guidance and sometimes acting out behind their parents’ backs or struggling to take on adulthood’s need for internal direction.[v]

    Two voices that seems to support Authoritarian parenting, Dr. Gordon Neufeld and Dr. Gabor Maté say

    The first business of attachment is to arrange adults and children in a hierarchical order.  When humans enter a relationship, their attachment brain automatically ranks the participants in order of dominance…. that divide roughly into dominant and dependent, care-giving and care-seeking, the one who provides and the one who receives.[vi]

    But, of course, having read the entire book, I know that they bring this aspect of authority in as opposed to the empty and often disastrous peer-oriented authority.

    Two voices that seems to question Authoritarian parenting, Maia Szalavitz and Bruce Perry[vii] say,

    Needless to say, spanking or any other form of harsh discipline does not and cannot encourage empathy: empathy is learned by having the experience of being treated kindly, not by being made to suffer…. most bullies do have the experience of being victimized – and it makes them want to get even, not help others….

    A voice that finds a middling spot on the spectrum of parenting is Jean Mercer[viii]. Research has shown her that spanking “as properly defined, not to blows with a paddle or other physical punishments” is not ineffective in the short term but “questions remain about its long-term effect.”

    Some explanation is offered in Great Myths of Child Development [ix]  to those who believe God has endorsed physical punishment as a loving thing to do. My parents certainly believed ‘Spare the Rod, spoil the child’ was endorsed by God to guide their parenting. Taking us to the bathroom, sitting himself down on the edge of the tub, Dad invoked, “Spare the rod, spoil the child”. followed by a confusing lament, “This hurts me more than you” to set our bums on alert as we lay across Dad’s lap. Turns out the Bible verse used to support this parenting tip may have been mistranslated.

    Although the image of a father doing the deed is the first to come to mind, Great Myths of Child Development puts forward data which shows that mothers use corporeal punishment or spanking as often as fathers.[x] And they visit the argument for letting babies ‘cry it out’ when being put to bed[xi]. Reviewing the various arguments for and against, they conclude “… so long as the child is over 5 or 6 months old, safe and well-cared for, it’s reasonable to stop responding to cries to be held or rocked during the night, allowing the child to develop self-soothing skills”.

    Great Myths of Child Development also addresses ‘Time-outs’ showing that brief time-outs are usually too weak to help decrease real behavior problems. This practice may also teach children what not to do, and without positive ‘Time-in’, does not teach the child what to do.[xii]

    Others’ parenting experiences, speaking to at least some aspects of the Authoritarian parenting style

    The book, Hunt, Gather Parent: what ancient cultures can teach us about the lost art of raising happy, helpful little humans by Michaeleen Doucleff.[xiii]

    Mom Feels Like A ‘Failure’ After Spanking Her Daughter [xiv]

    A mom has admitted to feeling incredibly guilty about the way she handled her unruly daughter and is seeking advice on how to not react the same way in the future…. the young mother explained that she had been cleaning the bathtub when her 3-year-old daughter wandered in. Concerned for her safety, she calmly told her daughter to either leave the bathroom or stand by the door since she was using bleach and their bathroom was quite small.

    …. With her daughter continuing to not listen, she picked her up and began carrying her out of the bathroom herself.

    However, while carrying her daughter, the little girl began throwing a tantrum…. At this point, she immediately put her daughter in a time-out, sitting her on a chair in the corner of the room.

    The time-out didn’t work though, and her daughter began to run around the room. Fed up with her daughter’s behavior, she grabbed her and spanked her. As soon as she did it, the young mom admitted to feeling incredibly “low” and a “failure” as a parent….

    “What could I have done differently in this situation? I couldn’t leave her in the bathroom to calm down because I had chemicals in the tub. Maybe the best solution is not doing things that she can’t help with when she’s awake, I guess.”

    [Readers responded] “Give yourself some grace. Try hard not [to] do it again,”….

    “Also, try to lower your expectations just a little bit. She’s a kid …. it won’t turn her into a monster. Pick your battles.”

    Another user added, “… You didn’t beat her or anything. You spanked her.”

    …. At the end of the day, no parent is perfect, and there are moments throughout child rearing when certain things don’t go to plan.

    The Atlantic[xv] speaks to fathers and the liminal space they find themselves in as fathers today, once filling the understood role of administrator of discipline was theirs, still confronted by children acting out of control, and no longer sure how to proceed.

    Detachment: an adoption memoir[xvi]   

    Peter who is 8 and Bohdan who is 7 had been adopted by Maurice and Betsy Mierau three years earlier.  The Mireaus were well into their own parenting style with the boys.  One winter afternoon, Mierau took the boys sledding, armed with hot chocolate. Because of copyright protection you will need to read the story for yourself, an incident that checks the boxes for Authoritarian, although overall, the memoir shows that this couple work hard at being warm and supportive Authoritative parents.

    Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption [xvii] recounts an interview with a counselor and social worker couple, both working with children and families. At the time of the interview for the book they had been adopters for 12 years. The children were a brother and sister whose early lives were traumatic, and before being adopted, the children had been in a “difficult” foster situation. This is how they end their interview:

    We’ve ended up being much stricter parents than I ever expected we would be, which has been a bit of a downside in some ways. I end up being somebody I almost don’t know, as a parent of adopted children… If somebody had told me this was the kind of parent I’d be I’d have said: “Don’t be ridiculous. I’m not going to be like that, I’m going to be my liberal, fun self.”

    But that had to change. I think all parents probably have that fantasy. I remember my dad saying he couldn’t believe how I was with the children – my sister called me Attila the Hun! But after a while my dad said I had been right to be tough. But it didn’t come easily to either of us.

    I’m Glad My Mom Died[xviii] A memoir of Authoritarian parenting by emotional manipulation.

     Footnotes


    [i]https://www.goodhousekeeping.com/life/parenting/a26987389/types-of-parenting-styles/

    https://www.parentingforbrain.com/4-baumrind-parenting-styles

    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK568743

    https://publichealthpost.org/healthequity/authoritarian-parenting

    [ii] Stryker, Rachel   “Emotion Socialization and Attachment in Russian Children’s Homes” Global Studies of Childhood, Volume 2, Number 2, 2012   https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.2304/gsch.2012.2.2.85

    [iii] https://generationcedar.com/2024/03/05/gentle-parenting-vs-traditional-parenting-a-word-to-todays-youngmother/    

    https://iastate.pressbooks.pub/parentingfamilydiversity/chapter/overindulgent-helicopter-styles

    [iv] Cummins Tantrum, Barbara   The Adoptive Parents’ handbook: a guide to healing trauma and thriving with your foster or adopted child   North Atlantic Books,2020, 105

    [v]https://openpress.usask.ca/lifespandevelopment/chapter/parenting-styles/

    [vi] Neufeld, Dr. Gordon and Dr. Gabor Maté   Hold on to your kids: why parents need to matter more than peersKnopf Canadian Publishing, Vintage Canada, 2013, 60

    [vii] Szalavitz,Maia and Bruce Perry  Born for Love: why empathy is essential—and endangered Harper Paperback, 2010, 313 

    [viii] Mercer, Jean Thinking Critically about Child Development: examining myths & misunderstandings,3rd ed.  Sage Publications, Inc., 2016 ,206

    [ix] Hupp, Stephen and Jeremy Jewell    Great Myths of Child Development   Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, Myth #40. 

    [x] Hupp, Stephen and Jeremy Jewell     Great Myths of Child Development   Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, Myth #47

    [xi] Hupp, Stephen and Jeremy Jewell    Great Myths of Child Development   Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, Myth # 13

    [xii] Hupp, Stephen and Jeremy Jewell   Great Myths of Child Development   Wiley-Blackwell, 2015, Myth #41

    [xiii] Doucleff, Michaeleen   Hunt, Gather Parent: what ancient cultures can teach us about the lost art of raising happy, helpful little humans   Avid Reader Press/Simon & Schuster, 2021

    [xiv] Tipton, Nia   Mom Feels Like A ‘Failure’ After Spanking Her Daughter Feb 04, 2024 https://www.yourtango.com/family/mom-feels-failure-after-spanking-daughter

    [xv] The Atlantic   July/August issue 2022, 87-89

    [xvi] Mierau, Maurice   Detachment: an adoption memoir     Freehand Books, 2014, 152-4

    [xvii] Hicks, Stephen and Janet McDermott    Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2016, 230

    [xviii] McCurdy, Jennette   I’m Glad My Mom Died   Simon & Schuster, 2022

  • Depicting Authoritarian Parenting

    I think we managed ‘happy families’ (check with the Brits on that one) until we signed Yasik up for school – roughly 3 weeks.  The journal says Week 3 was ‘one heavy duty week’. Yasik was, in parenting jargon, ‘testing boundaries’ in ways I have read are not unusual for institutionalized adoptees, or, for that matter, children from a great variety of family settings. His arsenal, sans effective verbal skills at the time, was physical: kicking, slapping, pinching, punching when we frustrated his desires with a “No”.   Surprised that the little cutie wasn’t seeing things our way, and having not prepared ourselves for that possibility, we went full ‘do what our parents did’.

    We spanked Yasik.  In our defense the journal testifies, only one smack to his bottom. Yasik cried but the smack quieted him, so I guess it slipped under the wire for not being abuse.

    Perhaps the crying though shook us up because we did some serious weighing of the pros and cons. We knew we were not comfortable talking about our autopilot choice to spank with anyone else, at all. Is spanking just politically incorrect or emotionally damaging? Is it faster and tidier? Does it teach him to hit to make a point?  Parents Under the Influence: words of wisdom from a former bad mother considers it important to clarify the basis of a choice to spank: if it is not a “malevolent impulse” or causing “lasting pain” it may be fine. For her it is quite another matter if it is regular and the ‘go-to’ response to the child’s behavior. Leaving long term negative consequences, it is abuse.[i]

    But Yasik needed to pay attention to our authority. He couldn’t be hitting back or talking smart we felt. Then again, were we thinking through the expectations we had that set him off? 

    Right from the start, putting him in kindergarten, I was rushing him and we were regularly late to school, igniting volcanoes of frustration between us.

    Dave and I were a couple born in the tail-end of the traditional parenting era, and now in our own middle years, we were coping with a daily experience more often the purview of a young couple (a common experience for adopters), and parenting a child with limited communication experience in English and very new to developing a sense of secure attachment to parents. 

    My only spanking experience up to this time had come when I was in my mid-twenties, with no parenting experience and still unquestioningly believing in “Spare the rod, Spoil the child”. I was babysitting for a couple who were raised, like me, in a traditional and religious society and who regularly turned to spanking to rein in their active adoptee. One morning when friends were visiting, the child misbehaved. I carried him into the bedroom and between whacks, screaming and crying filled the household. After all was returned to quiet and smiles, the woman visiting commented to another friend, “It seems to me that people are harder on children who are not their own.”

    That observation struck hard against a firmly unquestioned, and untested belief. Sensitivity to the comment was still there twenty years later to rattle my ideas about disciplining Yasik. 

    ‘Time Outs’ seemed to be bandied about among knowing parents we were in touch with as the ‘done thing’. Dave said that was how Dennis the Menace was disciplined; it sounded like a good recommendation, I guess. We embraced it as a discipline we could admit to among our circle of friends, and anyway, we had a child’s wooden chair as yet unfulfilled in its destiny. 

    We swung it into a corner of the hallway, getting into position to do battle.  I remember experiencing less emotion or stress when disciplining was simply the smack. Now we were starting the disciplining process with a tussle to get him on the chair as he and we were still amped up. Next was the stand on guard to keep him on the chair. But he did acquiesce, even if at times with tight-lipped giving in that could be read as ‘I will bid my time until I am bigger’. Other times it was hard to keep a straight face. When once he had to give in, he would turn to us to humbly plea, “No look,” before he stood up and went off to do what we ask. There was also the time I held him in my lap until he gave in and sat on the chair quietly and then he slipped over to me and we kissed and hugged. Wish I’d done it that way more often.

    And miracle of miracles, in short order just the threat of the chair seemed enough to get compliance. Check that method off and move on.  Again, without a lot of reflection. 

    A couple of cases in point.

    One evening after work, I was tired, impatient and would not wait for him to play in the tub where Yasik was finding endless wonders.  I’d moved on to his bedroom to dig out his pajamas. I wanted the bed time routine over so I could turn off and tune out.

    “Come on Yasik, bath time is over. Now get out of the tub and come into the bedroom to get your pajamas on.”

    Playing sounded like it was slowing down, and silence was taking over. Yasik had shown shyness about being naked, suggesting the way things might have been handled in the orphanage. He did not want to run naked from the tub to the bedroom, a stretch of maybe 10 feet.  But I was not trying to understand his no show in the bedroom.

    “Come on Yasik, get in here.”

    And now there was a wail. Yasik was sitting in the tub, alone and crying in real anger. Sighing in self-pity, I was about to drag myself off his bed and into the bathroom to scoop him out of the tub.  That self-pitying tiredness now curling at the edges with anger. Getting a 5-year-old to sprint naked from the bathroom to the bedroom was what I expected. I was not going to cave. He was going to obey. He was going to sprint naked from the bathroom to the bedroom. 

    Dave must have been hovering near by, for he magically appeared at the bedroom door. “Don’t!”, with a warning eyeball.  Some kind of male intuition?

    But somehow Yasik took charge. Yelling, “No look!” he snuck to the door to see if I was looking before running to the bed. Again it was hopeless not to see the funny. I popped out a “Boo!” and we both laughed.

    And here I interject a reminder from The Adoptive Parents’ Handbook: a guide to healing trauma and thriving with your foster or adopted child. Adoptees may have experienced abuse around bathing that has left them frightened of the vulnerability of nakedness.[ii]

    Two years into our parenting, encouraged by school staff, one morning, I went with Yasik on the school bus to help him get involved in gym. We chose not to push him to join in gym play the first year as most days there were so many other firsts in his life. Now just like deciding to take the worn training wheels off his bike and pushing him to try biking without that support, we decided to push him to join in the activities in the gym period.

    He and I stepped into the gym, kids running ahead of us, teachers taking charge, me thinking I must look in charge too. Slipping into this vibe, I tried to get him to do things just because magically I was along.  But my presence did not hold the weight I was assuming. He wouldn’t budge from his chosen place near the door.

    Translation: I can’t have anyone thinking something might not be working as it should but neither can I take any action that would look or sound out of control. That is the possible beauty of threats. They can be whispered with what appears like a calm (read repressed anger) interaction.  So I started to whisper threats. “Get out there and play right now or there goes today’s computer and TV.”  I gave a hint that if he waited any longer, tomorrow’s TV was going too.

    And then what Gail?  But I persisted and he adamantly refused.  A teacher thoughtfully slipped over to suggest that I and Yasik go to the trampoline because she told us being on the boys’ team with his more confident counterparts may be too hard for him. He may feel safer playing with the girls and they were on the trampoline.  He wanted to but wouldn’t.  Was he embarrassed about being relegated to the girl’s team, as well?

    I continued to cajole and threat.  Finally, I promised a prize, (euphuism for bribe), and he got on for the first time, smiling in shyness, still uncertain, because it was great.

    Inevitably, a few bounces in he fell and wanted down and then he wouldn’t go again.  This was a 6-year-old boy who was struggling with processing failure. I was responding by telling him I was proud of him and a prize was coming his way. But that fall overwhelmed him. When it came around for his next turn, he refused to climb back up on the trampoline.  I who had not thought that perhaps let it be was enough, or perhaps there was a private trampoline somewhere that he could test out before the next gym outing, threw out the bribes and went back to dire threats of returning to spanking.  And I could have managed that because there was a convenient bathroom off the gym.

    And in the moment I won. Yasik gave in and got on the trampoline. I saw a mix of shy enjoyment and a struggle with fear for between the 1st and 2nd attempt there were tears on my neck. As I watched him get up and try the trampoline again in front of peers who babied him still, I had to fight tears too. Yet he conquered the worst of it.  He was on his way. I was proud of him and of his stubborn refusals too.  He wasn’t going to follow blindly, I note in the journal.  But the question remains about how I handled my role in his struggle. I hope I at least followed through on the prize.

    Had we become complacent or tired of what corporeal punishment or its more politically correct cousin, ‘Time Out’ demanded? Or did we honestly think that having experienced spanking and the chair that Yasik was only needing the reminder of such consequences or some threat to the things he loved? Whatever our awareness, we now slipped into threat mode at signs of eruption.  Predictably I suppose, if we had not taken the time to think through what we were hoping for or how best to get there.  It could backfire.

    Another morning as usual we running late to drop Yasik off at his school. Checking for lunch box and bag, I noticed he hadn’t quite finished his homework. That was a BIG no-no to a couple, one teaching high school with the expectation of homework, the other finally getting a chance at higher-ed and both wanting to keep up appearance as parents who have their parenting together. With minutes to spare before we really, really had to go, we went into threat mode: “You won’t be going to T-ball tomorrow if you don’t hurry up and just do this last page!”

    The wail seemed to deflate his entire body.  Taking the high ground against this outburst, we brooked no argument, “Yasik, you gotta do your homework.”

    “Whhhhy? NOBODY in my class has to do homework?”

    (True enough, being second language, and struggling with reading, Yasik did have a heavier homework burden than his classmates.) Nonetheless, in my best no-nonsense voice, I carefully enunciated: “You. Won’t. Be. Going. To. T-Ball. Tomorrow. if you don’t get it done.”  Dave backed me up with a ‘No debate’ nod.

    He failed to do so. Following through on our threat is always considered admirable. We didn’t take him to the game. He felt the pain for disobedience all right.

    Thing was, we had the date wrong.  It was two days away and he got to go because he’d already gone through the wailing and missing-the-game pain the day before. I kind of think he could hardly wait to get home that evening to say, “Hey you guys, the game is tomorrow night, James said.” I looked at Dave. Dave looked at me. “What can we do? We got the days screwed up and he got the punishment.”

    Yasik also got the last big grin.

    And so the first couple of years went; learning effective anything takes a while I would observe at this juncture.

    Dave too holds memories of times he is concerned about how he shepherded. As I have mentioned several times, not only did Dave look forward to sharing his own love of the computer with Yasik as we prepared to adopt him, but in a very short while, after we returned from Russia, Dave and Yasik were poking the keyboard, and very quickly and steadily Yasik was becoming proficient at working his way around the internet. The excitement at a son’s quickness gradually U-turned into a concern about what his child might become exposed to.  To ward off danger, Dave secretly set in a path from which he would maintain control. Of course, sensible parents applaud, but Dave voiced concern over his handling of his control, secretively rather than in open discussion with his son.

    When I asked Yasik recently for his memories of our parenting, he didn’t come up with specific examples. Nonetheless, he said he definitely remembers times we handled interactions with “Because I said so” or “Don’t ask questions, just do it!” expectations. 

    Surely our language couldn’t have been that bald.

    Footnotes


    [i] David-Weill, Cecile   Parents Under the Influence: words of wisdom from a former bad mother   Other Press, 2020, 63,64

    [ii] Cummins Tantrum, Barbara The Adoptive Parents’ Handbook: a guide to healing trauma and thriving with your foster or adopted child North Atlantic Books, 2020, 18

  • Introduction to Parenting Styles

    Most parents start out with a child with no words. We started out with a child whose words we couldn’t find in the dictionary, and even if we found them, we couldn’t figure out how to use the dictionary’s definition to our advantage. When we said ‘Nyet’ to Yasik we had little idea what that communicated.

    We may have been playing dollies with Yasik for the first day or two, dressing him up and bouncing him around like children with a Ken doll as they try to bridge the gap between fantasy and reality. Yet even while doing ‘tourist’ around Moscow there were indications that our priority was not the thrill of the art museum but that we must constantly watch this little sprite darting about. With all Moscow offered tourists, we were at MacDonald’s feeding Big Macs to the birds. Hoping ‘Nyet’ was communicating as effectively as ‘Pee-sat?’. 

    Even though Dr. Spock said parents know more than they think they do[i], let me begin this group of posts about parenting by straight up saying Dave and I had the awareness of Donald Rumsfeld when we took on parenting; there were “known knowns” and “known unknowns“, but then there also are those “unknown unknowns”.[ii] The “known knowns” would be similar to what SNL suggested Kevin Federline might have known: 1. Always feed your children. 2. Children are ‘babe magnets’.  3. For the rest, Federline suggested parents should call him to babysit.[iii]

    We didn’t have Federline’s phone number so that was a non-starter.  But like Federline, Dave quickly picked up on how much of a babe magnet Yasik was for women gave him their seats on the bus and fawned over Yasik.  So that was good. And we did know to feed our kid. But maybe for that one we were simply following the Golden Rule of ‘do unto others as you would have done for yourself’.

    Was advice regarding actual parenting offered in the pre-adoption course we took? Almost certainly our adoption seminars offered all they could. I am equally sure that we would have nodded along enthusiastically to whatever suggestions were listed on the big paper flip chart. But in the excitement of beginning the adoption process, did parenting advice stand a chance?

    Definitely, being caught up in the daily demands of our lives, we certainly were not about to make a study of parenting.  Nor did we think we needed to do so, although of course there was, by the 90s, a great deal of guidance available to parents.[iv]

    I also now know we were not the only not-so-super parents out there for Scott Simon in Baby We Were Meant For Each Other: in praise of adoption[v]takes pains to note that some otherwise excellent parents showed neither interest nor made the time for books or support groups while raising their very happy child.

    Supposing we had given it a passing thought, could we have articulated what we wanted to do as parents? Certainly, no manual was tucked into the non-existent bag sent along with Yasik as he left the orphanage. Nor did we expect one. If the local radio journalist who interviewed us outside the courthouse in Yaroslavl had asked us how we planned to parent, we would have planted a look on our faces that tried for “We’ve got this”, hoping she didn’t look too deeply into our eyes where something less confident, somewhat quizzical was starting to show through. But the question never came up, everyone benignly assuming our son of one hour was in good hands because we would ‘just know what to do’.

    We were asked by the social worker who did our post-adoption interviews about Yasik’s medical visits, physical and mental development, eating and sleeping habits, his personality, our child care plans and family adjustments but I remember nary a question about how we were dealing with discipline and helping him with the character development needed to develop into a good and happy human being.

    I begin asking questions and seeking answers for our parenting now at the suggestion of Dr. Bruce D. Perry who says

    The brain is an historical organ…. Our life experiences shape who we become… And so, since we tend to care for our children the way we were cared for ourselves during our own childhoods, a good “brain” history of a child begins with a history of the caregiver’s childhood and early experience.[vi]

    As I was about to start this post, I ‘conducted’, or less pompously, ‘asked around’ about the assumption that we parent like our parents which perhaps more pompously is called the ‘intergenerational transmission of parenting’.[vii]

    The responses I got ranged from vehemently ‘Never’ to ‘Yes, my parents’ way worked for me’, but most also added on reflection, that ‘the times were different’.

    It is hard to be definitive about where our inclinations have come from, but our parents had up to 20 years to worm their techniques into our hearts and minds.  What is a bit scary is trying to objectively recognize that even if as children we heartily disapproved of some of their techniques, we went right ahead and reverted to these techniques as well.  They spanked, and yes, we spanked Yasik a time or two. 

    But for both Dave and I some childhood experiences were valued and continued. Dave was introduced to the tool box by his step-father and has always found a tool box to be a special kind of candy box. When Yasik approached his teens, he and his dad made plans to fix up my little Civic when I moved on to a newer model.

    I had great memories of shared laughter at evening meals and tried to make place for this ritual in our lives with Yasik.  However, like others, we too had to make adjustments; ‘the times were different’. It was harder to massage our schedule so that we could sit down together to share the evening meal. But we, consciously or not, were doing many of the things our parents did with us. They fed and clothed us and sent us off to school; vacations were pilgrimages to visit the relatives. Going to the lake with family and friends or going for drives up the mountains were also important.  Having parents equally involved in our home care was also respected.  If my mom was working, then my dad burnt the pancakes. Dave’s dad cooked with the salt and pepper shaker. It worked the other way with us. I boiled up macaroni, heeding Dave’s reminder to read the directions, when he had to work over supper. Wearing hand-me-downs was a given; no noses got stuck in the air when we were offered hand-me-downs for Yasik. Interests were encouraged as far as the dollar could reach. Dave’s mom bought art supplies for him and even sent one of his cartoons into a drawing contest.  I still hear the Hallelujah chorus when I remember the day my mom took me to the library. Perhaps taking Yasik to an indoor climbing gym has had the most lasting value to him.

    Gabor Maté in The Myth of Normal: trauma, illness & healing in a toxic culture, in a tone that sounds quite confident, assures us that “all of us, by virtue of being human, are endowed with a natural drive and talent for child-rearing…. Both men and women have latent child-nurturing circuits in their brains, …”  Maté was referring to “the body’s natural opiates – all of which awaken in parents nurturing habits that are essential to the survival of the young.”[viii]That is a relief.  Parents come equipped.

    And we did have resources with quite the adequate tool-box actually. Our ‘known knowns’ were not limited to ‘the body’s natural opiates’.

    Dave and I were middle-aged parents who had lived in a variety of environments.  We had whatever our parents had taught us, and we had ample time to observe ways that other parents parent.  Chapter Five of The Origins of You: how childhood shapes later life reminds us that

    Parenting is multiply determined. In addition to a parent’s own child-rearing history, parents’ health and well-being, their occupational experiences, the quality of their intimate relationship, and the social support they secure from friends, neighbors, relatives, and co-workers may all influence how parents parent…. too … how children themselves behave matters when accounting for why parents parent the way they do.[ix]

    Happily, the depth of my current ‘research’ did not end with asking others about where their direction for parenting came from.   One warm summer day, I was taxiing the neighbour kids to the Dollar Store, a trip the neighbour, in the house between us and the kids, said they made sound like a trip to Disneyland. They range from 2 years old to 15.  On the way I asked them what they thought a parent was. The 11-year-old without hesitation listed off pretty much everything a Google search would offer: protect and provide.  The 15-year-old topped the list up with “and have fun”.

    Hard on the determination to move from the ‘known knowns’ to the ‘known unknowns’, I questioned Google as well. The descriptors now ramped up: numbers, letters and alliteration.  1,2,3 Magic Parenting, the 3 As of parenting: Authoritative, Attachment, and Acceptance or the 3 Fs of Positive Parenting: Firm, Fair and Friendly or the 3 Ts Parenting: Tune In, Talk more, Take Turns.  And so it goes until at least 10 unless you consider Jordan Peterson’s 12 Rules for Life with two rules that are directly related to parenting: #5 – Do not let your children do anything that makes you dislike them and # 11 – Do not bother children while they are skateboarding.[x] Is it all summed up in the Parenting Golden Rule: “Treat your child as you would like to be treated if you were in the same position”, which is apparently simple, straightforward, and successful? Ok, like the neigbour kids said, protect, provide, and have fun.

    Adopters too?  Yes, although we may not have dramatic hormone changes, bio-fathers, adopters and other consistent care-givers “show bonding to the same degree as biological mothers” which “awaken in parents nurturing habits that are essential to the survival of the young”.[xi]

    It is beginning to look like we came into parenting with some juice in our brains to vitalize our parenting and some useful ‘known knowns’ from the worlds we inhabited.

    And for those ‘known unknowns’ and ‘unknown unknowns’, I am going to interject here something I have heard so often.  If anything should not work out according to the fantasy, adopters have a nice little ‘escape hatch/cop out’ from responsibility for their parenting, especially parents of older adoptees.  Should they accept it: the tsk, tsking of onlookers who intone, “Well it’s in the blood”, or those who shake their heads in commiseration to remind us, “Well those first 3 years are the most important”, adopters have ready excuses for their own parenting failures.

    As recounted in earlier posts, Yasik’s parenting began first with his bio-parents and then a hospital staff followed by the orphanage. What can a hapless adopter do about that? Everything has been sewed up before they even start. Can’t fault their parenting styles, right?  

    To turn a quote from Gabor Maté around: “no, [parents] did not create the world in which they must parent [their children]. Yes, parents are responsible for their children;”[xii]  We are not off the hook. Our parenting styles matter.

    Accepting that responsibility as we understood it, how would our parenting be analyzed and what can be learned from our parenting journey?  The analysis is based on the work of Diana Baumrind, a developmental psychologist who began her research in the 1960s, providing three of the basic parenting styles. In the 1980s, Stanford researchers, Eleanor Maccoby and John Martin added the fourth style.[xiii] These four styles are Authoritarian, Neglectful/Unengaged, Permissive and Authoritative. As is evident by the list of styles mentioned earlier, these four shots are only the ‘opening volleys across the bow’ of the discussion on parenting styles.   Depending on how we come packaged into parenthood, in these times, we can choose to parent from a buffet of styles. An article in The Irish Times, which I accessed through my library’s online data offerings, provided a list of styles parents might choose: Helicopter, Drone, Lawn Mower/Bulldozer/Snow Plough, Free Range, Tiger, Dolphin, Koala, Jellyfish, Lighthouse, Gentle, Crunchy/Silky/Scrunchy, Concierge or as noted above, Conscious.[xiv]  Seriously.

    Howevvver, I am not going to fill my plate from that buffet.  The 4 original styles will satisfy, with the following considerations brought forward by Jean Mercer. After reminding readers that the adoption process is stressful for many, but not all, children, she goes on to say “The effects of adoption depend on three highly significant factors that may be quite different for different adopted children: the child’s age at separation, the circumstances surrounding the adoption, and the care-giving abilities of the adoptive parents.”[xv] On with the analysis of our parenting styles.

    As an appetizer/mood setter/ tension builder, I have included a little quiz I found and indulged in, based on the four parenting styles. If you are a tad curious for yourself you will find the quiz at this address: Practical Psychology “Parenting Style Quiz (Free Test + Instant Results)”  Feb 1, 2024 https://practicalpie.com/parenting-style-quiz/

    Please also note though before you do so that there is a caveat applicable in any curiosity: …. Human motives are always mixed and at least partly concealed, hence, endlessly arguable”.[xvi]

    Our results: because both parents must be considered for their styles and input,[xvii] I appealed to the better angels of Dave’s nature, getting him to take the quiz just after I completed it.  Maybe it was nearing suppertime and I was fogging over; whatever, I managed to add up the numbers each of us chose for each question instead of the number values given to each. And then I spent the next 24 hours angsting over the designations these numbers offered.  One of us was borderline Neglectful and the other, Permissive.  Maybe Permissive could be met with a bit of a shrug and giggle, but Neglectful?  That one elicits, at the very least, a grimace and groan.  I wanted to delete the quiz, shoving the results under the rug, but I also want to honestly explore our parenting.  In the morning, I went back over the quiz looking for a way to ease it into my determination to be open and honest in my search and, whew. I saw my mistake and I recounted.

    For some of the questions I was on the fence, thinking it depends on the situation, choosing the middle option, #3. And while Dave did not stay on the same fence for as many question responses as I, we came out with exactly the same scores, barely inside Warm in the first set and barely inside Demanding for the second set. Whew again! We managed to raise Yasik according to the nice sounding parenting style – Authoritative.

    But I cannot ignore the impact of my emotional response to the three negative styles and what my image of myself and Dave would have had to acknowledge had we landed in any of these styles that are less than admirable and certainly not trending currently.

    Add it all up and our parenting styles come from all that is swirling about in our brains, bodies and emotions, the parents who parented us, the times and the environment in which that parenting played out, and our values for, as is the habit of values, they take shape influenced by this mix of nature and nurture. 

    And we are off, skipping along the yellow brick road, off to ask the wizard what kind of parenting we provided for Yasik.

    Footnotes


    [i] Spock, Benjamin   The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care   Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1957

    [ii]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_unknown_unknowns

    [iii] Season 33, Episode 2 of Saturday Night Live, which originally aired on October 6, 2007

    [iv] Neufeld, Gordon, PH.D. and Gabor Maté, M.D.  Hold On To Your Kids: why parents need to matter more than peers   Vintage Canada, 2004, 5

    [v] Simon, Scott Baby We Were Meant For Each Other: in praise of adoption   Random house, 2010, 44-45

    [vi] Perry, Bruce and Maia Szalavitz   The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog: and other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook.  Basic Books, 2017, 89

    [vii] Belsky, Jay, Avshalom Caspi, Terri E. Moffit, Richie Poulton.  The Origins of You: how childhood shapes later life.  Harvard University Press, 2020, 110.

    [viii] Maté, Gabor MD and Daniel Maté   The Myth of Normal: trauma, illness, and healing in a toxic culture.  Knopf Canada, 2022, 160, 165

    [ix] Belsky, Jay, Avshalom Caspi, Terri E. Moffit, Richie Poulton.  The Origins of You: how childhood shapes later life.  Harvard University Press, 2020, 110.

    [x] Peterson, Jordan B.  12 Rules for Life: an antidote to chaos   Random House Canada, 2018

    [xi] Mercer, Jean. Understanding Attachment: parenting, child care and emotional development. Praeger Publishers, 2006, 74

    [xii] Maté, Gabor with Daniel Maté.  The Myth of Normal: trauma, illness & healing in a toxic culture.  Knopf Canada, 2022, 179

    [xiii] Kuppens, Sofie, Eva Ceulemans    “Parenting Styles; a closer look at a well-known concept”    J Child Fam Stud, 2018, Sep 18;28(1): 168-181 doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6323136/

    [xiv] The Irish Times “Helicopter? Free-range? Concierge? What kind of parent are you? How do you parent? There’s a meme for that amid the modern obsession with dissecting and defining parenting styles”   July 18, 2023 https://www.irishtimes.com/health/your-family/2023/07/18/helicopter-free-range-concierge-what-kind-of-parent-are-you/

    [xv] Mercer, Jean. Thinking Critically about Child Development: examining myths & misunderstanding. Praeger Publishers, 2016, 246

    [xvi] Alexander, Bruce K.  The Globalization of Addiction: a study in poverty of the spirit.  2008, p. 154

    [xvii] Francis, Richard C.  Epigenetics: the ultimate mystery of inheritance.  WW Norton, 2011, 72-73

    [i] Spock, Benjamin   The Common Sense Book of Baby and Child Care   Duell, Sloan and Pearce, 1957

    [ii]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/There_are_unknown_unknowns

    [iii] Season 33, Episode 2 of Saturday Night Live, which originally aired on October 6, 2007

    [iv] Neufeld, Gordon, PH.D. and Gabor Maté, M.D.  Hold On To Your Kids: why parents need to matter more than peers   Vintage Canada, 2004, 5

    [v] Simon, Scott Baby We Were Meant For Each Other: in praise of adoption   Random house, 2010, 44-45

    [vi] Perry, Bruce and Maia Szalavitz   The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog: and other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook.  Basic Books, 2017, 89

    [vii] Belsky, Jay, Avshalom Caspi, Terri E. Moffit, Richie Poulton.  The Origins of You: how childhood shapes later life.  Harvard University Press, 2020, 110.

    [viii] Maté, Gabor MD and Daniel Maté   The Myth of Normal: trauma, illness, and healing in a toxic culture.  Knopf Canada, 2022, 160, 165

    [ix] Belsky, Jay, Avshalom Caspi, Terri E. Moffit, Richie Poulton.  The Origins of You: how childhood shapes later life.  Harvard University Press, 2020, 110.

    [x] Peterson, Jordan B.  12 Rules for Life: an antidote to chaos   Random House Canada, 2018

    [xi] Mercer, Jean. Understanding Attachment: parenting, child care and emotional development. Praeger Publishers, 2006, 74

    [xii] Maté, Gabor with Daniel Maté.  The Myth of Normal: trauma, illness & healing in a toxic culture.  Knopf Canada, 2022, 179

    [xiii] Kuppens, Sofie, Eva Ceulemans    “Parenting Styles; a closer look at a well-known concept”    J Child Fam Stud, 2018, Sep 18;28(1): 168-181 doi: 10.1007/s10826-018-1242-x  https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6323136/

    [xiv] The Irish Times “Helicopter? Free-range? Concierge? What kind of parent are you? How do you parent? There’s a meme for that amid the modern obsession with dissecting and defining parenting styles”   July 18, 2023 https://www.irishtimes.com/health/your-family/2023/07/18/helicopter-free-range-concierge-what-kind-of-parent-are-you/

    [xv] Mercer, Jean. Thinking Critically about Child Development: examining myths & misunderstanding. Praeger Publishers, 2016, 246

    [xvi] Alexander, Bruce K.  The Globalization of Addiction: a study in poverty of the spirit.  2008, p. 154

    [xvii] Francis, Richard C.  Epigenetics: the ultimate mystery of inheritance.  WW Norton, 2011, 72-73

  • Set and Setting: spiritual

    Psychology asks how we find ways of being in the world that we can live with, homeostasis. It seeks a way to adapt to the world whether a person has a sense of safety or not, can trust or not, believes he or she is accepted or rather is seen as less than, does or doesn’t belong, is unloved or loved.

    Spirituality asks a different question. It asks about the meaning, purpose, connections[i] behind the desire to find a way to adapt.

    Were Yasik’s adaptations evidence of a new or reconstructed narrative, a narrative of evolving meaning, purpose, connection, a sense of belonging and being loved, and what could ultimately be trusted?

    Yasik’s spiritual mindset pre-adoption

    The chaos following the collapse of the Soviet regime was not only political and economic. It was also a turn from atheism back to religion, perhaps trying to make sense of the collapse. For those who took it upon themselves to restructure Russia, it seemed a good idea to reinstitute the Russian Orthodox Church and, maybe in attempt to not leave any stone unturned, welcome international protestant missions.

    Given this endorsement, the Russian Orthodox Church would visit orphanages to hold services, baptize children and teach them basic catechesis. I have no doubt this was a sincere attempt to fill what they recognized to be a spiritual and identity void among young orphans.  Soviet portraits were taken down and holy icons set up, offering a visual of where a child might turn for help or hope. For a brief time, according to Human Rights Watch, international protestant church missions were allowed to distribute Bibles and educational booklets to children in orphanages.  These missions, both Russian Orthodox and Protestant, also sought to show care through teachings of Jesus’ love and through gifts to the orphanages[ii]. 

    And whether only ostensibly for the children but really to entertain the staff, in the 1990s, TVs were on all day. Apparently not to children’s programs but to American, Mexican or Brazilian soap operas. This might have been a secular spiritual substitute, offering its own brand of meaning, purpose and connection or maybe, simple escape into a fantasy meaning or connection. I find it hard to draw a purpose from this avenue to the spiritual. Still… maybe a child might.

    Did Yasik get any religious exposure which might have offered him some meaning and connection, maybe even purpose?  Google suggests perhaps. Yaroslavl is historically a religious hub in Russia. In hopes of economic help if not always interest in the spiritual well-being of orphans, the Russian Orthodox Church and international Protestant missions were welcomed in Yaroslavl’s orphanages in the 1990s. Considering that I remember Yasik’s orphanage to have been somewhere near the center of Yaroslavl, I can assume he was exposed to religious teaching, icons and humanitarian aid. He may even have been baptized. During this time icons were mass produced images to be hung on walls. Wallet-sized cards were laminated or plastic-backed to be given to each child for something of their own. One icon often handed out was the Guardian Angel icon showing children that they were watched over and not alone.

    Might a pocket-sized icon of his very own have comforted Yasik?


    Did he, even before being given a poppa and momma of his own, see some family meaning and connection in religious teaching, and icons? Or was learning to self-soothe by rocking and singing to himself, sharing his life with his peers, hoarding what he could his avenue to meaning making? How he understood connection?

    When I was young, I often heard the Roman Catholic adage: “Give me a child until he is seven and I will show you the man”. It is a phrase the church apparently no longer uses, but the concept of the impact of those early years of neuronal growth remains a given[iii].

    In those first four years, Yasik may have absorbed a sense that family was a protective angel or his little peers or only himself. Yet with the snap of a magician’s finger the world he was born into had simply disappeared. The magician had called another image of family into being. Going forward, what would ‘I have a poppa and momma now’ have meant to him, offered him?

    Yasik’s spiritual mindset post-adoption

    Dave and I each had religious backgrounds that left us at this stage in our lives with a belief in a loosely defined higher power.  We found meaning, purpose and connection in family and careers. We prayed but we did not particularly observe many religious dictates. I cannot know what Yasik believed in at five or six. I do know we encouraged Yasik to pray to ‘Dear God’ just as he may have done in the orphanage. Dear God was an invisible entity but Yasik saw the possibility in enlisting Him to help him on a spelling test. When he got all the words spelled right, in his prayer that evening he wanted Dear God to know.

    We encouraged a firm belief in other invisible entities as well, Santa and the Tooth Fairy. At five Yasik and I were out sledding and saw a man dressed as Santa sneaking around the side of a house.  We hurried home to get ready for when Santa got down to our block. If some understanding of a Guardian Angel/Dear God held meaning and connection for him, Santa likely was no leap of faith.

    But as the years went by Yasik began testing Santa’s telepathy by keeping his wants from us.  We went to great lengths to outsmart him at that point.  But the time came when magic and reality started to argue for Santa got a Gameboy mixed up.  Another time, we forgot to replace a tooth with money.  That one last time, we put 46 cents under his pillow the next night and told him the tooth fairy went cheap because it was irritated with his lack of faith. The time came when he also let us know he no longer wanted to pray with us. Probably thought what was the point if even the tooth fairy was a grouch.

    Whatever narrative of things spiritual he had was being questioned. Where had things spiritual for him moved on to? Where would he now place his trust? I do know that while he gave up on prayers to Dear God, he has continued to plug into music. Perhaps this has continued to be his way of communing with the spiritual.

    For the first years of his life Yasik understood connection, particularly to belonging in a family, as unstable at best.  Now he was either going to build on that meaning or reconstruct it.  Did having a poppa and momma signify meaning and connection?

    I once asked Yasik, now an adult, who he would say was his ‘Higher Power’, the AA label for help with meaning, purpose and connection. He said Dave and I and his bio-sister were his Higher Power. We are often told, in quite a literal sense, parents are a child’s first representation of a higher power. Perhaps for some of the difficult parts of becoming an adult, it remains an option.

    We do know having a poppa and momma meant Yasik had his own shoulder to cry on. He could ask about things that troubled him and not be shut down. He still belonged. He had rights.  There was no need any longer to hide his toys. Even when he was disciplined, he received continued love.  If there was a boogie man, he could crawl into bed with his poppa and momma.

    He was not alone. He may not have known that he was about to age out of the baby house while at the orphanage, but he saw children leaving his orphanage and not returning. Now as far as he could tell, he now had a home and would not be someday expected to move on. Family, both nuclear and extended, was an assumed, everyday part of the fabric of his life now. Family gave him meaning, purpose and connection now. Yes family as a higher Power may also mean that higher powers are not omnipresent, omniscient or omnipotent, but they aren’t abandoning either.

    Sharon Stone was lying in a hospital bed, dying of a stroke when her grandmother appeared from beyond the grave to tell her that ‘they’ on the other side had not yet figured out how to help her live, “But they were working on it.”[iv]  For me, that is definitive family. Not always up to the hopes but there, sticking around and wanting to help.

    Again I cannot tell you what his mindset was. I simply believe it is human to want to find meaning, purpose and connection.  In what Yasik has expressed to us, in choices he has made, in his adaptations, I believe he was moving from uncertainty about his place in the world to new hopes of family, a sense of belonging and being loved, and what could ultimately be trusted. He was choosing Pokémon over Pushkin.

    Yeah but, – No but: the years ahead would test his meaning, connection and purpose. Was the old narrative entirely dissolved? [v]

    I don’t speak my Father’s native tongue…
    I don’t know where I belong

    Would the struggle suggested by the song, Native Tongue by Mo ‘Ju[vi] continue to make finding meaning and connection difficult? Yasik, as an adult, did once say, “I just wish I’d had a say”, referring to his adoption. I did not ask what he might have wanted us to know.[vii]

    Footnotes


    [i] “Making Meaning (Part 2): What does Spirituality Have to do with Meaning-Making?” December 19, 2023 https://thethrivecenter.org/meaning-making-part-2-what-does-spirituality-have-to-do-with-meaning-making/

    Tix, Andy, Ph.D.    “7 Ways People Experience Spirituality” Psychology Today, June 30, 2025 https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-pursuit-of-peace/202506/7-ways-people-experience-spirituality

    Delagran, Louise, MA, MEd.  “What is Spirituality?” https://www.takingcharge.csh.umn.edu/what-spirituality

    [ii] Fish, Will   “A Russian Christmas Story: “For Always”  Eternal Perspectives with Randy Alcorn December 1, 1999

    https://www.epm.org/resources/1999/Dec/1/russian-christmas-story-always

     Golovko, Oksana  “Bishop Philip of Karasuk Saves Orphans and Baptizes Children with Active TB” Pravmir.com, March 9, 2015   https://www.pravmir.com/bishop-philip-of-karasuk-saves-orphans-and-baptizes-children-with-active-tb/

    [iii] Edlund, Matthew J., M.D. “Give Us A Kid Till She’s 7 and We’ll Have Her For Life”  The Power of Rest  Psychology Today  March 7, 2013 https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/the-power-rest/201303/give-us-kid-till-shes-7-and-well-have-her-life

    Lipton, Peter  Ask Philosophers November 11, 2006

    https://www.askphilosophers.org/question/1443

    “Give me a child till he is seven years old”

    Source, Commonweal, 08/01/2016

    Miles, Dr. Helen  ‘Give me the child until he is 7 and I will give you the man’ — Psychologically informed reflections on the importance of early life experiences on later life…’ Medium  Jun 25, 2021

    https://drhelenmiles.medium.com/give-me-the-child-until-he-is-7-and-i-will-give-you-the-man-psychologically-informed-922cc9b3eb38

    [iv] Stone, Sharon   The Beauty of Living Twice   Knopf, 2021,18

    [v] “Orphans’ Lonely Beginnings Reveal How Parents Shape A Child’s Brain”    HEALTH NEWS FROM NPR  February 24, 2014   https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/

    [vi] https://genius.com/Moju-native-tongue-lyrics

    [vii] Johnson, Lesli  “10 Things Adoptees Want You to Know” The BLOG U.S. Edition HuffPost November 1, 2019 https://www.huffpost.com/entry/adoption_b_2161590

    Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoptions: practical tools for today’s parents   Perspectives Press, Inc.   2002, 151

  • Set and Setting: psychological

    I can’t read minds, not even to see into my son’s mindset.  His setting I can do; I kept a journal and I read, read, read. But how my son picked up on the settings he found himself in and how his translation of his environment and interactions with it settled in his mind, I can only make suggestions with what indications I think might be viable. This is why this post turns to psychology.

    Yasik’s mindset pre-adoption

    Adopting Yasik made us a family. But it was not ‘family’ as we had until then understood family.  Yasik came to us with a script of family already written, starting with his biological family.

    As backdrop to my teasing out what Yasik’s mindset may have been as he began life as part of a family in Canada, see the summary provided here.

    Deborah D. Gray’s presentation of Childhood Emotional Development as it relates to adoptees[i]

    For many years I was at the very least annoyed when I heard or read the edict:  the first four years are the most critical in a child’s development. Yet I can find nothing that argues against the understanding that the brain is growing to nearly its full capacity in the first four years. Children’s foundational understanding of family comes in these first four years. The science appears settled.

    In place before Dave and I had an opportunity to parent our son.

    So what might have been already in place?

    Christine Kenneally in The Invisible History of the Human Race[ii]citescountries with attitudes of distrust going back centuries. From historical accounts and Russian literature, I think, whether as long-standing or not, Russia qualifies for a cultural attitude of distrust of those outside family and community.[iii] 

    As Kenneally says, “Sometimes the past matters, …” We are “shaped” by those who raise us and who were in turn given their direction by those who raised them. On and on back into many generations, “The implication is that the way we see the world and act in it …is significantly shaped by internal beliefs and norms that have been passed down in families and small communities.” 

    Yasik understood family from as early as his first couple of months with parents who were not always available to respond to his cries. He moved on to hospital care which it is not hard to surmise was under staff and resource constraints given the economic crisis in Russia in the ‘90s. Too many sources make the point that his cries could hardly have always been acknowledged.

    Is it wild speculation then to suggest[iv] Yasik’s mindset was imbued with distrust?  Through what filter was he reading the experience of being part of a family?

    Orphanages in Russia in the ‘90s apparently had the same economic constraints of society in general. That tension could quite possibly have spilled over to staff interactions with the children.  However sweet the children may have been, staff could not offer them hope for a bright future. Staff may have consciously or otherwise nurtured the children in a message more Pied Piper than Cinderella in the stories read to them, the poems taught, and the guiding comments.

    Russian children were often warned to get to sleep or Babayka would come, pop them in his shoulder bag and take them away. Talk about a sweet night time lullaby. Or better yet, seeing the Volga River nearby, one kid may have tried to scare another by saying, “The Black Volga drives around kidnapping children, you know.” 

    Yeah, but—No, but … kids hear these same messages in the West; the difference though is that such messages are not hailed as healthy messaging.

    How often in a day might staff or other children have felt it necessary to warn, “Just keep your mouth shut. Who do you think you are?”[v] 

    Who did Yasik think he was is right. He was an orphan, cute yes, and in a baby house, yes, but the adults who interacted with him each day likely conveyed consciously, or not so much, that he was still a child with no functioning family.  I have read enough literature on Russian orphanages to be aware that the general attitude about an orphan was not as hopeful (to put it kindly) as would have been the case in a family, even a Russian family believing that it’s best their children not be given unrealistic hopes. What perception was Yasik left of himself and his place in his world?  In a culture that placed a premium on family, of belonging, was a sense of being less important, a ‘lessness’, to those around him creeping into his developing sense of himself?

    Once again, Yeah, but—No, but: a young man who supported Russian activist, Alexei Navalny, and now lives in the U.S.A. sees value in the Russian perspective. “I miss that unguarded intensity, that baseline reckless abandon of the soul. That baseline depth Russians operate on manages to produce great works of art and science and endure unbelievable levels of hardship while doing so. And on a more personal level, it allows us to cultivate connections with others that are just hard to match in Western cultures.”[vi]

    Orphanage personnel often reason too that it’s best, considering the future of most orphans. Better not to sugar coat the future in a world that has little place for a child without family.  How many stories read to the children in Yasik’s orphanage would have been about having a momma and poppa? How did he see himself in such stories? If at any time parents of other social orphans dropped by, Yasik would have seen mommas and poppas. No one was dropping by to check on him. How could he not have been aware that he was without family? 

    In perhaps a bizarre way, children in orphanages may have a sense of family, one that has ‘jumped’ the usual developmental phases, turning to peers as family. Instead of consolidating first with parents and nuclear family, they are in a setting that is largely and most intimately with their peers, even thwarting or confusing the early awareness of family.

    ‘Peers as parents’ in early childhood is dealt with often in writing about institutionalized children.  The child knows peer parenting or self-parenting or peripheral parenting that may have changed often as staff and children come and go from institutions. Bruce Perry, in The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog provides an example in the story of Peter who spent the first three years of his life in an orphanage described as a “baby warehouse”.  In eight-hour shifts children received about 15 minutes of individual staff care and likely far less interaction with other adults.

    With no one but each other to turn to, the children would reach their tiny hands through the bars in to the next crib, holding hands, babbling and playing patty-cake.  In the absence of adults, they became parents to each other.  Their interaction, as impoverished as it was, probably helped to mitigate some of the damage such severe deprivation can cause.[vii]

    These interactions became their expression of their understanding of parenting, developing out of whatever they could hobble together to cope with their emotions and desires.  The adults were on the periphery, like overseeing, but emotionally detached, butlers to their needs. Yasik too may have been prematurely turning to peers in the absence of adult interaction.

    Yasik should not have been orienting toward his peers until around 6 years of age. What does it mean if a child has entered Phase VI prematurely having learned to turn to other children when looking to satisfy emotional needs and perceptions of the world?

    Did being told the night before he was adopted that he had a poppa and momma need much explanation?

    Yasik’s mindset post-adoption

    24 hours later Yasik had a poppa and momma, a family. His mind now had to reach out to accommodate additions to the narrative built in the first four years.

    It remains reasonable to me to wonder if he tried to start a new one or simply adjusted the first narrative to one which included him, not one where he knew he was outside. But possibly a narrative that had a shaky foundation.

    Sitting in a Kerrisdale Starbucks, our adoption facilitator began our first post adoption visit by pointing out that Yasik looked like Dave and had my eyes.  How was that perceived by a young mind now trying to concoct or restructure a concept of family, belonging, difference, and self?

    Psychological theories look at how a mindset might be evident in the way the body and brain/mind express the impact of thoughts and feelings[viii]. Psychology also has to do with theories about how our actions communicate the mindset of our thinking and feeling. These ‘actions’ encompass how people learn, make choices, feel emotions, and get along with others. This will be the closest I come to ‘reading’ Yasik’s mindset.

    Yes, Yasik was hardly yet developed in terms of his understanding his world and his place in it, but he came from four years of, as Deborah Gray presents, uncertainty about caregivers and his value to them. Gray also points to a learned helplessness that may have come from his not being able to conjure up a momma or poppa when he yearned for them.

    And then one sunny day in August he is called to the kind doctor’s office just as he may have seen other children called. Just like in a fairy tale he now has a poppa and momma too. As magical as that now sounds, he seemed to us to be taking it all in stride. Weeks later the social worker assessing our family fit noted that he seemed to be keeping pace with all the developmental charts.

    The youngest child two doors up just turned 5. She is currently 43 inches tall. She likes to drink apple juice out of an old champagne glass. And she likes to take care of getting this drink herself.  The apple juice jug is 10 ½ inches tall and weighs 3.78 liters or just over 8 lbs. When she drags it out of the fridge and over to the counter, it looks like her arm is being stretched a few inches. For added flourish she plops a freezie into the glass.  As Gray notes, she wants to take care of things herself, to be competent. She will start kindergarten in a couple of weeks. Now not wanting to be different will also begin to kick in.

    Yasik too was wanting to try out his competence.

    He was also showing signs of wanting to fit in.

    Starting kindergarten a few weeks after joining our family, it was not long before he didn’t want to see pictures of the other kids at the orphanage and would say he remembered nothing of his early years.

    While he thought for a short time that he came from the moon, he, for a time, also referred to his arrival in Canada as “when I was born”. And again, ‘Yeah but, – No but’, that may simply have had to do with the limits of his English at the time.

    Was he trying to counter that already resident sense of lessness with a compromising explanation of differentness?  As I have written in earlier posts, he explained to us, that as he saw it, some people came from their mommies’ tummies and other kids are ‘picked kids’. Nor did it take long before the ‘real’ parent questions came up. That ‘hole in the heart’ message that comes up so often with adoptees.[ix]  Another time he asked where some part of his being (whatever it was, I didn’t record it) came from in him and then said, in a tentative manner as though uncertain whether to say it or not, that this part must have come from his ‘real’ parents. He did not want to be different. He wanted to fit in with the kids in his neighbourhood, school and on his sports’ teams as would fit right in with his age[x].

    The one certainty is that he had family narratives for relationships on his mind from almost the beginning of his life with us.  Ready or not for a kid still formulating a concept of family, these were experiences Yasik was also gravitating toward.

    Adaptations.  To find some sense of security as many, many manuals state, we all find coping strategies for homeostasis.  The first I noticed Yasik using adaptations was with his school work but later I realized he had adaptations from well before he came into our family.

    Facing a harsh reality, lacking responsive caregivers, what does the child do?  An unnurtured child will find ways to take care of his or her own nurture.  Yasik would hoard toys for himself, hum along to music or rock himself. Because he continued to rock himself for most of his first year in our family, I assume he developed rocking, as did many children in orphanage care for their early years, to self soothe[xi].   Again, what did “I have a poppa and momma now” mean to him?

    My brother when he saw a doctor advancing toward him with a needle that from his perspective could have been a dagger, wriggled out of mother’s grasp to hid under a chair.  Yasik, was never medical treatment adverse. Because it offered some adult attention?

    In Detachment: an adoption memoir,Maurice Mierau found it curious enough to bring it forward as noteworthy that neither of his children resisted taking medications. “[Peter] and Bohdan both enjoyed taking medicine of any kind. In the orphanage, visits by the doctor had been one of the few times they got sustained individual attention from an adult. Both of them hugged and kissed me and Betsy when we administered routine cold remedies or children’s aspirin”.[xii]

    From our naïve perspective we were happy that Yasik seemed to be keeping in step with the stages of childhood development, if we had any awareness of childhood development at all.  Yet there he was, turning to his dad to be lifted into his arms and cry into his shoulder when struck by a ball while up at bat in T-ball. There he was cuddling and kissing with much less restraint than his little buddies did with their parents. There he was crawling into bed with us even though he had a whole big bedroom to himself. There he was, using soothing techniques like rocking himself to self soothe, and there he was, as his teachers informed us, more often playing at recess with younger children than those of his chronological age.  Born for Love: why empathy is essential – and endangered notes, “…previously institutionalized or otherwise neglected children tend to bond better with younger boys and girls.  Even though they can catch up surprisingly quickly in loving homes, they tend to seem younger than their chronological age”.[xiii]

    Footnotes


    [i] Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002,Chapter 8, “Emotional Development: Promoting Attachment at Every Phase”, 189-257.

    Cruz, Mimi Ko “Studies reveal how instability may shape infant attention, brain activity and emotional regulation” Medical Press, August 29, 2026

    https://medicalxpress.com/news/2026-08-reveal-instability-infant-attention-brain.html

    [ii] Kenneally, Christine   The Invisible History of the Human Race: how DNA and history shape our identities and our futures   Viking, 2014, 139-158, 218-219, 264, 305, 311, 314 

    [iii] Nikolova, Milena, Olga Popova, Vladimir Otrachshenko  “Stalin and the origins of mistrust” Journal of Public Economics, Volume 208, April 2022

    Szalavitz, Maia, Bruce D. Perry, M.D., Ph.D.  Born For Love: why empathy is essential- and endangered   William Morrow, 2010, 119

    [iv] Szalavitz, Maia, Bruce D. Perry, M.D., Ph.D.  Born For Love: why empathy is essential- and endangered   William Morrow, 2010, 111-114

    [v] “The Russian Obsession with Suffering: where it comes from” Polyglottist Language Academy Sept 17

    https://www.polyglottistlanguageacademy.com/language-culture-travelling-blog/2025/9/17/the-russian-obsession-with-suffering-where-it-comes-from

    Shipman, Matt, Amy Halberstadt, Julia Chentsova-Dutton  “Studies of Children’s Stories Shows Differences in Russian, U.S. Approaches to Emotion” NC State University, December 2, 2021

    https://news.nscu.edu/2021/12/childrens-stories-and emotions

    [vi] Siewart, Rafaela    “Two Drinks With … One of Russia’s Most Wanted” The Free Press, 08/14/26 https://www.thefp.com/p/two-drinks-with-one-of-russias-most?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email

    [vii] Perry, Bruce MD, PhD. and Maia Szalavitz. The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog: what traumatized children can teach us about loss, love and healing. Basic Books, 2017, 244-245.

    [viii] Pollan, Michael   A World Appears: a journey into consciousness   Random House LP, 2026, The chapters 2&3 on Feeling and Thought

    [ix] Szalavitz, Maia, Bruce D. Perry, M.D., Ph.D.  Born For Love: why empathy is essential- and endangered   William Morrow, 2010, 59

    [x]Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002, 246-247.

    Johnson, Lesli “10 things Adoptees Want you to Know”  U.S. Edition HuffPost Updated, November 1, 2019   https://www.huffpost.com/entry/adoption_b_2161590

    Szalavitz, Maia, Bruce D. Perry, M.D., Ph.D.  Born For Love: why empathy is essential- and endangered   William Morrow, 2010, 58

    [xi] Perry, Bruce D., MD, PhD, and Maia Szalavitz   The Boy Who Was Raised As a Dog: and other stories from a child psychiatrist’s notebook   Basic Books, 2017, 70, 87

    Szalavitz, Maia, Bruce D. Perry, M.D., Ph.D.  Born For Love: why empathy is essential- and endangered   William Morrow, 2010, 70, 130,135

    [xii] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 120 – 121.

    [xiii]Szalavitz, Maia & Bruce D. Perry, MD, PhD. Born For Love: why empathy is essential – and endangered. William Morrow, 2010, 57,70.

  • Set and Setting: social, western Canada

    Boarding a plane in Moscow in the early morning, we left a harvest moon in our wake. For Yasik transitioning from a Russian social setting to a social setting in a western Canadian family and urban community was a transition from life on the moon[i] to what? The image of the moon seems apt enough. Barren and life limiting. Wildly different from what we believed we were inviting Yasik to share with us in our family and community. Promise of a chance for a good life.

    A young judge proclaimed Yasik our son from now on because his bio-parents had neglected him. Conventual wisdom tells us how amazing we are for adopting a little waif. We need to remember that resume building for sainthood is also a rap sheet for the sins of the first parents, as “flawed and unworthy“.  The child becomes a “lucky-adoptee” and the parents with whom the child will always carry some connection, are endlessly brought to mind with a whiff of lessness. “This causes a split in the [adoptees] hearts and minds that’s very painful.”[ii]

    Building a new mindset about family

    Yasik left behind an understanding of family that led him to say “I have a poppa and momma now.” After knowing us less than 24 hours.  Dave carried him into the Vancouver airport with no moon hovering.  An extended family greeted him as he was whisked into a community with a van, a house and lots of toys. “In one day, these children become part of well-educated, affluent, stable and loving families”.[iii]

    I’ve said in earlier posts that Yasik left the orphanage with nothing other than what we provided. Not quite true. His strabismus had not been accommodated. And in time we would find that he struggled to keep up in the classroom. Was this because at the orphanage staff were stretched to find time to sit and chat with a little kid or answer the ‘Why?’ questions of a three-year-old?

    Yeah but, – No but …  let’s shake off the clutches of an apocalypse. We humans, however we are packaged, have flexible minds and bodies. While Yasik remains seldom the talker in most groups, he has always found ways to adapt.[iv]

    Maybe the orphanage staff read stories of families to the children; maybe he saw the parents of other social orphans drop by. Maybe he had some idea of poppas and mommas. He certainly seemed ready to embrace a family setting.

    As far as we could tell, our setting as parents was not consciously hierarchical or paternal. Dave and I thought of ourselves as partners, forming a nuclear family.  Yasik chinked into that assumption when almost from Day 2, he assigned us the traditional roles, taking ‘Nyet’ from Dave, cuddling into me.  We wondered if such a role assignment was wise – but for whatever reason, in the journal – as a 3rd day parent- I write “we want to argue roles but they are still there; why did he assign roles that way? We may believe we have a more liberal or sophisticated view of Ma and Pa in parenting but it would appear we are building on ancient structures that remain part of our thinking”. Did Yasik want us to maintain some image he had of a papa and mama? Or maybe it is simply some personality vibe we gave off and he responded to for, though I cannot be certain, from two years old to life with us, his caregivers were likely all female, allowing for little opportunity to see how the male role played out.  

    What does this mean for single parents or same sex parents? Do they too have to work through some pre-conceived image the child has of parental roles? Almost from the start Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption 2nd ed.[v] begins to consider this question.

    My earliest journal entries note that Yasik’s explanation of his story showed that rather quickly he began working on his story, developing his mindset. While he thought he came from the moon, he would for a time also refer to his arrival in Canada as “when I was born”. He told us that there are kids who come from mom’s tummy and kids who are picked kids. But at the same time, because he knew I could not have any more kids and we have to assume he was hoping for a sibling, he suggested that maybe Dad could have a girl. At other times he said he liked being an only child.   The one certainty is that we cannot deny he had family narratives for relationships on his mind from almost the beginning.

    Being four and half at the time of his adoption, he knew he was different, that parts of him belonged to someplace else.  The other kids in his class had narratives of life with their parents before kindergarten.  No surprise then when that one question belonging only to non-biological families, the ‘real’ parent issue, came up rather early as well, so we talked.

    One day he made it clear that he was aware of his differences from his buddies with the blunt and direct, “You aren’t my real parents.” Another time he asked where some part of his being (whatever it was, I didn’t record it) came from in him and then said, in a tentative manner as though uncertain whether to say it or not, that this part must have come from his ‘real’ parents. I wonder where he picked up the term ‘real parents’?

    There were no blatant physical differences between Yasik, Dave and I as Susanne Antonetta has experienced with her Korean born son, but the baseline experiences of the ‘real’ parent issue are the same. I will paraphrase some of her experience with ‘The Question’ and then encourage you to read make me a mother.[vi]

    Around the same age that Yasik was beginning to piece a narrative of his story together, Antonetta’s son, Jin, was also working out how he came to be. It was hard for Jin to accept the story, though true, but the explanation was given to him in an age-appropriate narrative: “For him, it’s hard to understand being flown somewhere to be given to two strangers, however good everyone’s intentions.” But for the most part initially Jin did not seem to be giving too much thought to his adoption says Antonetta although she wondered if he “struggled with something I could not put my hands on to fix.”

    Antonetta and her husband did follow one of the top ten guidelines for adopters: Be open about the adoption; answer your child’s questions. She adds something interesting to this advice: Because her son had heard that babies come from mommies’ tummies, she thought her son likely “heard the story with the coda of the tummy belonging to another woman”. When Jin was eight, he began to ask about his bio-mom, telling Antonetta that thinking of her made him feel sad. He told her he thought it was unfair that he didn’t even know what she looked like.

    Antonetta’s response was likely the response of most caring adopters: “I hadn’t expected it all to be so hopelessly confusing”. She sought to draw him closer but sensed his uncertainty, however vague.

    One particular instance of the awareness of difference that tends to call up a sense of lessness came when she and Jin were playing together at a park. Antonetta had gone for her bag and returned to where Jin was playing to find him being questioned and taunted by some young boys.  Seeing her ‘Caucasianness’ and his ‘Asianness’ they asked why Jin was with her and then asked if he was an orphan, following the question by then throwing the word “Orphan!” at him. Antonetta had been expecting to deal at some point with the question of adoption and the differences that come with it, but she was unprepared for it happening in an arena of being bullied for the differences.  Jin actually thought the bullies would not have made a scene if they had not seen the racial differences between herself and her son.  She says of the experience:

    He was in a rage at me.  He couldn’t forgive me for having been with him, for being who I was. He cried and repeated that I should have just stayed away from him, all the way home. I hurt for him. I hurt in a way that ripped me apart….

    To bridge or help Yasik as he built his own narrative, Dave told Yasik of his own adoption and then told Yasik he has a bio-brother, bio-sisters and a bio-parent set. Dave explained that probably money problems are why his bio-mother left him in the orphanage. Dave then reaffirmed that Yasik was all ours and we were his now. We also talked about the orphanage, telling him all of the scant story as we knew it then. About all we could do at the time was to be sure that the questions were answered as satisfactorily as possible hoping that he still felt secure.  At the time I wrote: “Some [of that sense of security] can’t happen – he is divided but may it never destroy his spirit”.  And when you think of what I have just recorded from Susanne Antonetta’s book, you have to wonder how Yasik was receiving the narrative we were presenting to him.

    Of course, being a kid, he used the narrative too at times.  Dave had a shift and was juggling, just once I might add, getting a babysitter for Yasik. He responded by becoming frustrated and obstinate, saying to me, “Why is it parents are meaner to kids who have a different beginning and come from a different place?” Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents suggests feelings like this may come from the fear of losing another parent and advises against too much daycare until the child has a sense of security within the family.[vii]  So let me repeat in our defense, our memory is that we called in a babysitter once for our disgruntled son.

    Building a new mindset about community

    Yasik not only had an active part in setting up our family setting, he also, as a school-aged child, led us into most of our social engagement outside of family. We three were Caucasian, each with at least some eastern European genes; Dave and Yasik are males and I am a female; Dave and I are Canadian born and Yasik is naturalized.  Yasik and I have a large age difference but Dave and Yasik are fairly appropriately spaced.   Dave and I, with some post-secondary education, were working to hold on to a yet tenuous grasp of the middle class. These parts of each of us fit us into certain societal slots. We would want to find a social setting that would accommodate our comfort levels. Or so you would think.  Yet we were almost irrevocably part of a community based mostly on the decision to buy a house within our means found for us by a realtor who was the son of a friend of our friend. He showed us two houses: this one looked cuter than the other. Decision made.  We dove into the community pool of life in our little neighbourhood.

    Yasik was learning to swim in this community pool guided from the pools edge by teachers, coaches, music teachers, parents of buddies, friend of ours. Each was impacting his environment, influencing his spirit, mind and body in not only big ways, but often in almost imperceptible ways. Yasik and I were watching a video sent home with him from school about a snowman who takes a little boy and flies away with him to a snow land.  Yasik said, “Mom I didn’t know snow persons could fly”.  I almost corrected it to ‘snowman’ and then realized he’d been taught to be politically correct.

    Yasik’s community school was a block away and most of his classmates lived within walking distance of the school.  Day upon day, walking him to school we came to know the other mothers, fathers and caregivers walking his classmates to school.  First a tentative nod, then a ‘Hi.” And then “Hey, can Yasik come over to play?” and the doors were swung wide open to our little community. We signed him up for the T-ball and soccer clubs.  Some of his classmates were on his team. Quite naturally, these kids became his playmates and standing on the sidelines or waiting for the kids after school, the kids’ parents became our playmates.  The thing about these social relationships is that they are most often ad hoc.  There is little to no opportunity to review resumes, ensure that we are leaving our child in the best of hands, filtering out characters or the impacts of characters who may not share all of our values.

    Via school and neighbourhood, Yasik made buddies. For parents this can be a two-edged sword.   Yasik loved to play with the kids, free time for us. I suppose a ‘Yipppee!’ and ‘Goodie!’ might have erupted from time to time in our thoughts as friends begin to tip the scale in their favour over time with parents. One year in a DIY bid, Dave bought a pair of clippers and gave Yasik a buzz cut – I think the one and only, but visions of dollars saved were dancing in Dave’s head. Yasik looked like a miniature Dave, but big whoop.  After the cut, Dave told Yasik to go look in the mirror.  Yasik looked and let out a mighty wail.  “Dad, nobody will know my name”. Sooner than an adopter of an older child might want, attachments were expanding and shifting.

    Meaning there are negotiations to be made.  It could be said interacting in your community is learning to swim in life’s community pool.  Mostly it was fun to be with the kids, but it meant struggles too.  Each of us parents benefit by the de facto babysitting but we are uncomfortable with our child being watched over in play over by another parent who may have no problem with yelling at the kid or smoking around them, or with seeing our child bested by another.  We may want to helicopter parent when letting well enough alone leads to growth in confidence.  It is a gamble between stepping in to fight our children’s battles or holding our breath and allowing them to work it out on their own.   For the most part we let Yasik work it out, checking on him after the fact.

    At Yasik’s eighth birthday I noticed him laughing that covering, defensive, too loud laugh he used when his two main buddies bugged him and he got upset and rightly so.  One of the two would needle just to get a rise (in fairness the little needler was dealing with family issues too). I asked Yasik how he felt about it and he said it got him, so I said, “Just laugh.” (Duh, that is what he was doing) and then he said, “It gets in my head” – meaning it made him angry before he could stop it.  I was impressed with his self-awareness.

    And while these encounters may have started a learning process in relationships, I do think for Yasik, already aware as an adoptee that he perceived himself and was perceived by those around him as different, the kind of lessness Jin felt was also being developed.  Hidden Daughter-Secret Sister, Bitterroot: a Salish memoir of transracial adoption and Monstrous: a transracial adoption story [viii]all speak to the sense of differentness and lessness.  Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies[ix] calls it a “sense of separateness“. (If these suggestions are not enough, then my page Sources offers a good number more books with this message).

    I took Yasik and his buddies to Lazer Tag one evening and Yasik – though no one expected it when they should have as he often did so – got the highest scores. He shot people well. In a group including adults he came in second and the young braggarts in his group came quite last.  He was that way in baseball too – consistently doing well – not in fits and spurts of glory. At the end of one season in soccer Yasik got carried off the field like a somewhat shocked but very happy hero.   Yet the myth of his lessness persisted.

    While playing lacrosse after school with The Two, Yasik’s primary buddies, the ‘who-gets-to-be-on-which-team’, a learning hurdle so many children have to face, became the lesson of the day. Number One as usual took the lead in choosing whom he saw as the better players, first inserting himself in the important position. Yasik would not contend the setup, slipping immediately into second place but mentally focusing on his anger or hurt or revenge and seeking to get even.  In this case, checking in frustration, not Number One, but Number Two in an unfair way. I made Yasik stop immediately and took them all home. Number One ran to tell his dad with Number Two following.  I assured the father I was dealing with it but before I had begun meting out punishment, Yasik stepped forward to apologize to Number Two of his own volition. Number Two, always a peace maker, returned the apology, maybe realizing that because Number One had to head to hockey practice now, they would only have each other to play with.

    The ‘who-gets-to-be-on-which-team’ lesson surfaced again for Yasik the next week at school.  Yasik was faced with the ignominy of once again not being chosen for the favoured team.  Whatever revenge Yasik sought to enact, when Dave came to pick him up at school, he was told Yasik had been made to ‘stay after school’.  We all know what that phrase means. Dave went to the classroom to get Yasik. Upon seeing him, Yasik started crying hysterically. The school authorities figured he had been punished enough. Talking it over later that evening, Dave and I decided he had too much competitive tension and wanted the school to redirect him from Mr. Number One, Mr. Number Two and Mr. Number Three triangles.  He was handling his pressures with explosions, and we were hoping to show him alternatives. In a social circle of great importance to a school-aged child, one that encompasses after-school playtime, soccer teams and social interaction between the adults attached, it is difficult to find other options, factoring in that these kids see each other as each other’s best options for great times together.

    Still the question: Is it such a big deal?  Jennifer Traig cites a study that found that siblings argue 3.5 times per hour, 80% of the time over toys.  (Incidentally, and likely part of being in Phase VI on child development registers – joining in and finding my place-, parents get to be the issue only 9% of the time).[x]

    Julie Lythcott-Haims, in How to Raise an Adult: break free from the overparenting trap and prepare your child for success[xi] says

    Sometimes kids are bullies…. When bullying happens, kids need parents and other advocates to help them disentangle themselves from it and recover….

    A definition of …True bullying — intentionally disempowering or isolating individuals and systematically demeaning and hurting them over a period of time.

    But as Susan Porter wrote in Bully Nation, in a lot of situations we parents label something a bullying incident when it’s a normal passage through child development and socialization…. Porter encourages parents and educators to avoid the bully label and instead help children develop the resilience needed to handle the harsh social challenges of life.

    (Incidentally, Alexander McCall Smith, in The Sweet Remnants of Summer, Chapter 8, offers a nice example for how to handle the tricky uncertainty of fault assignment in children’s squabbles.)

    Yet, via bullying or not, if a sense of lessness becomes a worm embedding in a child’s already weak sense of self, then what?

    The idea of lessness (it is tempting to suggest the term ‘marginalized’) was also fertilized by adult opinion.  Yasik had listened in on enough conversations to know he was different in his birth narrative, in his shortness, in his struggles with learning.  And at times it got capped off by adults like his soccer coach who, Yasik’s skill to the side, wouldn’t let him be goalie because of his height, again letting him know he was coming up short (I couldn’t let that one go).

    As I note in Set and Setting: social, first Russia as early as four years old, children have begun to recognize the false beliefs in others’ messaging[xii]. While it seems Yasik’s mindset around family had to find accommodation for two families, his mindset around community was making use of the awareness of false belief. For whatever words came out of the mouths of those around him, he believed they saw him as less. And his reactions in these moments clearly state that he felt that was both wrong and unfair. 

    Footnotes


    [i] He is a Person  www.adoptionasfamily.org

    [ii] Easterly, Sara, Kelsey Vander Vliet Ranyard, Lori Holden Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies   Rowman, 2023, 40

    [iii] “Orphanage experience alters brain development”

    W News, University of Wisconsin-Madison, February 17, 2003  https://news.wisc.edu/orphanage-experience-alters-brain-development/

    [iv] IBID

    Human Rights Watch “IV. THE “GILDED CAGE” OF THE DOM REBYONKA: INFANCY TO FOUR YEARS” https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/russia2/Russ98d-05.htm

    [v]  Hicks, Stephen, and Janet McDermott   Lesbian and Gay Foster Care and Adoption 2nd ed. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2018

    [vi] Antonetta, Susanne. make me a mother: a memoir. WW Norton, 2014, 135-142.

    [vii] Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002, 34.

    [viii] Mooney, Kim   Hidden Daughter-Secret Sister   Austin Macauley, 2020, 23

    Harness, Susan Devan   Bitterroot: a Salish memoir of transracial adoption   University of Nebraska Press, 2018

    Myer, Sarah   Monstrous: a transracial adoption story First Second, 2023

    [ix] Easterly, Sara, Kelsey Vander Vliet Ranyard, Lori Holden   Adoption Unfiltered: revelations from adoptees, birth parents, adoptive parents, and allies   Rowman, 2023, 60

    [x]Traig, Jennifer   Act Natural: a cultural history of misadventures in parenting   Ecco, 2019, 180.

    [xi] Lythcott-Haims, Julie   How to Raise an Adult: break free from the overparenting trap and prepare your child for success    Holt Paperbacks, 2016, 23,24

    [xii] Hare, Brian and Vanessa Woods   Survival of the Friendliest: understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity Random House, 2020, 57, 89

  • Set and Setting: social, first Russia

    ‘They’ say we are social beings, maybe on a spectrum from extrovert to ambivert to otravert to introvert to …, BUT most of us do seem to want people in our lives.[i]

    Being part of a group, with family ties and community provides protection, access to resources, and opportunities for cooperation.

    For the individual in the social group, being accepted by others, feeling valued and having a social identity within a group tends to ensure better physical and mental health helping us climb a notch or two higher up Maslow’s ladder to a sense of self-worth.[ii] A setting seeding a mindset.

    For his first four years, Yasik had family and community. What mindset was being constructed from these connections for him?

    Year one, 1992-1993 approximately: Yasik is in the bosom of his bio-family, with parents, an older half-brother now going to school at the age of 6, and two sisters, one a half-sister and the other his full sibling, born a year earlier.

    Sometime around his first birthday, social services found Yasik in his crib unattended. His parents were working in a factory and being given food and china made at the factory to sell. As I wrote in the post, Court Proceedings, we were only told that his mother “moved around a lot”. Boris Yeltsin’s Article 13 of the Family Code allowed social services to rescue/apprehend children when parents “shirk duties involved in his/her upbringing and maintenance, for over six months”. A Yaroslavl court spelled it out when examining Yasik’s parents care for their children. This court concluded that “the parent’s neglect their children, do not care for their lives, do not support them”.  

    It would seem I can be justified in saying these rulings imply a lack of infant care. Let’s assume that Yasik did his bit, crying for care and getting his bio-mother’s oxycontin juices flowing. Her breasts should have been leaking, tingling with heaviness and wanting a letdown.[iii] Not feeding him, she may have been packing around some painful breasts, perhaps even infecting them.

    Yasik’s mom knew what to do with packed and painful breasts. The greater pain was left to an infant to absorb. Something as simple as skin-to-skin contact would have washed away stress and added protection against a physical backlash of infection and the possibility of hindering brain and body development. Oxytocin which “reduces feelings of threat and enables trust” would have been offered in the breast milk. Eye contact would have would have not only increased his feeling of being loved but would have begun to stretch his nascent theory of mind as he looked where she looked and at the things she might have pointed to. Had his mother picked him up when he was crying, not only would she have halted his crying, but she would have helped him relax and sleep better. Long term she would have encouraged his growth hormone and directed his mindset to trust the caregivers in his life.[iv]

    Year two, 1993-1994 approximately: social services stepped in to take the children from the family. The older brother brought the family to social services’ attention with his bruised body and his plea not to be returned to the family. Yasik was taken to a hospital, almost certainly low on staff and supplies. There is no good way to note that his mother actually came to visit Yasik at the hospital to seek money designated for his care. She stopped coming to visit her youngest son when she was denied this money. And with no family money to pay for expenses, Yasik would have been given second-class treatment in a struggling hospital[v]. He was not given the opportunity to learn to walk while he was there.  Rescue, rinse, repeat.

    Year three to four and half, 1994- 1997 approximately: Yasik was moved to an orphanage as a ‘social orphan’. He had family. Once again there is no good way to say that to sell the factory china the parents needed to travel past the care homes three of their children were in.  Not once did they stop to check in on their children.

    A Russian doctor with years of experience working with orphanages called the baby house orphanages “Gilded Cages”. They received international attention and appeared better equipped than the average orphanage for older or disabled children.[vi]

    But an orphanage is still an orphanage. An orphan, social or totally without family, faces prejudicial stereotypes: the stigma of abandonment.[vii]

    Someone’s children in a Russian orphanage

    The mindset Yasik was forming of family may have been written in one word: abandonment.

    What of community? Orphanages were state institutions. State institutions still held the collective Soviet philosophy of the group over the individual.  There was no reason to offer orphans personal possessions for most would have a hard time acquiring much once they left the orphanage. Case in point: Yasik’s dirty, too small, pink runners. This is also where a mindset to hoard geminates. While the orphanage proudly shared that Yasik had given to the other children our first gifts to him (code for they were taken from him?) the things we gave him as we tourist- parented in Moscow were hidden behind the apartment piano. 

    Even in the best case, children who are closest to normal health at birth become [socially, intellectually, emotionally and physically stunted] to some degree after these four years of collective living, deprived of individual nurture. Even the nannies who “love” them, treat them mostly—really like pets. They do not really see that there is a person inside who could think, or learn something. [viii]

    Even when a staff is concerned enough to try to give the children some concept of family, it can often confuse or add pain.  After meeting us for a short time on our first visit, Yasik was heard to say, “I have a poppa and momma now.”  What understanding had he of parents and family with no memory of his own family and with, at best, only glimpses of others’ family life?

    From our earliest infancy, we are absorbing a mindset and a theory of mind. We watch where our caregivers’ eyes are looking, where their hands and bodies are moving, particularly in relation to us. We are coming to understand how we are cared for and what that means for our place and value in our world.

    Yeah but, – No but… At four and half, Yasik was part of a group with family ties and then orphanage community. You could say he had been provided with protection, resources and opportunities for cooperation.

    Henry Wellman, a psychologist, makes an interesting observation about the development of our theory of mind, and I would include, our mindset. He reasoned that by the time a child is four years old, he or she is equipped to know when “what someone else thinks is mistaken.”[ix]

    Footnotes 


    [i] Perina, Kaja “Why Most Crave Connection—and Why Some of Us Don’t” https://www.psychologytoday.com/ca/blog/beyond-school-walls/202408/why-we-crave-connection-and-why-some-of-us-dont September 12, 2024 

    https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/introvert-extrovert-ambivert-you-might-what-think-wanda-thibodeaux-co2fc

    [ii] Cherry, Kendra   “Understanding collectivist Cultures: individualism vs collectivism” https://www.verywellmind.com/what-are-collectivistic-cultures-2794962 June 4, 2026

    “The Importance of Connection on our Well-being” https://executive.berkeley.edu/thought-leadership/blog/importance-connections-our-well-being

    “Social connection linked to improved health and reduced risk of early death” https://www.who.int/news/item/30-06-2025-social-connection-linked-to-improved-heath-and-reduced-risk-of-early-death 30 June 2025

    [iii] Martino, Jessica, Jennifer Pegg, Elizabeth Pegg Frates   “The Connection Prescription: Using the Power of Social Interactions and the Deep Desire for Connectedness to Empower Health and Wellness” American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine 2015 Oct 7;11(6):466–475. doi: 10.1177/1559827615608788

    https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6125010/Top of Form

    [iv] Kumar, Karthik, MBBS, Medical Reviewer: John P. Cunha, DO, FACOEO   “How Do Hugs Make You Feel?” MedicineNet, Inc. 11/4/2024 https://www.medicinenet.com/how_do_hugs_make_you_feel/article.htmTop of Form

    Alloway, Tracy P, Ph.D.  “What 20 Seconds of Hugging Can Do for You”  Psychology Today, January 19, 2022

    Hare, Brian and Vanessa Woods   Survival of the Friendliest: understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity Random House, 2020, 74, 97

    [v] Human Rights Watch “IV. THE “GILDED CAGE” OF THE DOM REBYONKA: INFANCY TO FOUR YEARS” https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/russia2/Russ98d-05.htm

    [vi] IBID

    [vii] IBID

    [viii] Human Rights Watch “II. THE ODYSSEY OF A RUSSIAN ORPHAN” https://www.hrw.org/legacy/reports98/russia2/Russ98d-03.htm

    Paddock, Richard C. “The Grim Face of Russia’s Orphanages” World and Nation Dec. 17, 1998 https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1998-dec-17-mn-54995-story.html

    “Orphanage experience alters brain development” University of Wisconsin – Madison News  February 17, 2003​​  https://news.wisc.edu/orphanage-experience-alters-brain-development/

    Cacioppo, Stephanie   Wired for Love: a neuroscientist’s journey through romance, loss, and the essence of human connection   Flatiron Books, 2023, 21, 23

    [ix] Hare, Brian and Vanessa Woods   Survival of the Friendliest: understanding our origins and rediscovering our common humanity Random House, 2020, 57, 89, 91

    Orphanage Risks  adoptionasfamily.org

  • Set and Setting: culture, language, religion

    If you had asked us point blank, we would have assured you that we were going to honour Yasik’s Russian heritage.  I guess by going to Russian meet-ups and by eating piroshkies, but in reality – likely because we gave it no conscious thought to what retaining his Russian heritage might mean – we were going to be turning Yasik into a Canadian with little pretense of retaining his Russian beginnings. He was going to adapt to or take on Canadian society’s behaviours, language, art and institutions to showcase Canadian values, ideas or beliefs.

    Again the question, what were we missing of Yasik’s mindset already in place?

    Culture

    Maybe it is not particularly common to smile at others while walking about downtown Vancouver, but in our small town, we smile as we weave in and out of others on the street or at the grocery store. Downtown Moscow, we felt a bit affronted that when we smiled, we received non-committal, even frowning, return stares. Apparently it was considered rude to smile automatically at strangers. Smiling was reserved for connection that is just not there with a stranger. Connection is with family. Perhaps because their history is soaked in hardship and distrust of strangers.[i]

    Yet with Yasik in our arms on the Metro, people gave up their seats to us, just as they did for Dave carrying a sleepy Yasik home at the end of a day in Canada.

    Would it not inspire pride in Yasik’s heart if we were to stoke whatever embers of first-culture awareness remained?

     adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children over age four[ii] provides a list of suggestions for how adoptive parents might strengthen ties to a child’s first cultural heritage.  We would have loved to take him on a holiday to Russia or found more people to spend time with who were culturally Russian.  Other suggestions were over the top for us, ranging from reserving a special night each week to soak in all things first-country, or hunting down a barbershop or salon that catered to the child’s first world. 

    And so it was that there was no trip to Russia though we have always encouraged friendships with people from Russia whenever we encountered them.  But it dribbled to a stop there. Our adoption organization offered continued Russian connection, but other than one or two visits, we did not maintain this connection.  Yasik showed little interest and Dave and I are not extroverted enough to seek out those kinds of social events.

    We allowed Yasik to be swallowed up by Canadian culture instead as limited as that seems to be.

    Perhaps because we Canadians see ourselves as a mosaic of cultures, off hand, only a couple of customs stand out. We say sorry all the time. We are also known to say ‘Eh’ at the end of our greetings and we take our shoes off at the door. No resistance actually for Yasik as, maybe because Russia and Canada are well above the equator, Russians take their shoes off at the door too. 

    As a family we celebrate Christmas on December 25, not January 7, the Russian Christmas, and have fun or sleep in on most of the rest of Canada’s statutory holidays.

    Music, Art, Literature

    Yaroslavl is the birthplace of the professional Russian theater. Fyodor Volkov founded the first permanent public theater there in 1750.

    Canada’s cultural scene had no need of an art museum the size of the Hermitage in Saint Petersburg,

    Dave worked on art with a motorcycle focus; I read where ever my current interests took me.  Neither Dave nor I have the sense of holiness that Europeans seem to have for art and literature. It should also be noted that we had no idea what stories or fairy tales had been told or read to Yasik in the orphanage though my orphanage interview notes say he liked to be read to and learned poems by heart.  Someone was taking time with him.  Yasik was given a Pushkin story before we left Russia; we were scarcely aware of who Pushkin was to Russia.  Because we had little idea of these aspects of Russian culture, beyond a beginner’s understanding of art and literature, and did not sign Yasik up for weekend classes, he had almost no exposure to Russian music or art or literature.

    Acknowledging this, we may be coming off as intransigent boors with our lack of engagement in Yasik’s culture. Still with maybe a slight shrug, I can comfortably note that soon Yasik was collecting Pokemon cards, not more Pushkin.  Besides which Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents[iii] notes that Russian children have been told things like: “Close your eyes at night or the witches will come to peck them out“.  Not so different from our “The boogie man will get you“.

    We were told he was attuned to music, but the orphanage staff did not elaborate other than to encourage us to put him in music classes.  We did that.  As these classes advanced, they were more and more directed to classical piano.  By the age of 12, Yasik was pleading to be freed of them although it could be argued that he started to give strong hints almost from the start as he flopped his head down on the piano keys and moaned.  He wanted music but whatever the radio gave him to bounce and chant along with in sounds perhaps between Russian and English. Maurice Mierau’s youngest did the same, making “tuneless word-sounds that were neither English nor Ukrainian”.[iv] Be that as it may, Dave and Yasik were listening to a CD while driving somewhere one day.  Dave noticed Yasik in tears and parked, pulling Yasik into his arms.  Yasik broke into serious sobs even though Dave assured him it was only a song.  That was the power of music for him.

    Food, Clothing

    If Yasik’s orphanage was as Russian as we have to assume, he ate a fair bit of the staples of a northern climate: cabbage, beets, and potatoes or borscht, lucky kid. To help Yasik transition, our friend Tony directed us to some sausage shops and a store that made great piroshkies. Yasik definitely was into these and so were we. I am not sure Canada has any truly recognizable Canadian dish other than maybe poutine and lots of fish. Again, no problem for a kid who started life next to the Volga River. Yasik had no interest in MacDonald’s in Moscow but he soon cottoned on. And maybe Kraft macaroni and wieners are a Canadian dish. He adapted to that dish very quickly.

    Clothing was pretty much jeans, T-shirts and hoodies across the globe so that was never an issue.

    Language:

    Being Slavic means belonging to the largest ethnolinguistic group in Europe, with over 300 million people sharing ancestral roots and languages like Russian, Ukrainian, Polish.[v]

    Via language, values, attitudes and worldviews are communicated. Here are two cherry-picked proverbs from the languages listed above, all of which use the Cyrillic alphabet.

    Не имей сто рублей, а имей сто друзей

    Translation: Don’t have a hundred rubles, have a hundred friends.

    With hardship a given for many Russians throughout their history, this proverb would likely have nurtured the value of having friends. How might that have been messaged to an orphan, even a social orphan?

    Не выноси сор из избы

    Translation: Don’t take trash out of the hut.

    In Russian culture, family and private matters are to be kept within the home. It implies that exposing personal problems to outsiders is inappropriate and potentially shameful.

    Could this have been why the orphanage never provided much detail about the bio-parents shameful behaviour? Did Yasik pick up on anything shameful in connection with his family?

    I do not diss a language as rich as Russian. But learn it to ease Yasik into our life? We were adopting well before the possibilities now available in language-learning. Not that we were not encouraged to try. Our translator tried to screw a few phrases into our brains as we drove toward the orphanage. Yasik used words that were easily connected to motorcycles, airplanes and the need to pee. But slipping in a little suggestion like “Also, perhaps learn his native language before you bring him home…” Learn your child’s language while he learns yours might be a bit over the top.[vi]

    Getting an invitation to adopt may only arrive 6 weeks before the adopters are expected to fly over to the child’s country.  Maybe I am old school but I continue to believe that even with all the aids available today, to learn the child’s native language requires some serious investment. I googled just to be sure. With apps, Russian generally takes 11 to 14 months of daily study to reach a level just below intermediate, which would be enough to get to know your child. Much adoption literature, perhaps more ‘practical’ in this regard, notes that most adoptees will become comfortable with the language of their adoption within months of arrival.

    Yasik, thanks to Forest Gump (and yes, other sources), managed just that. Hidden Potential: the science of achieving greater things by Adam Grant suggests that “kids tend to absorb foreign languages faster than adults.“[vii]

    Their brains enjoy more plasticity, less prior knowledge to convolute and little to no fear of making mistakes. Dave and I, with at best 10 Russian words between us, only remember having fun with his renditions of words, like “sillyphone” for telephone.  We saw no bother on his face when we giggled at his chatter.  We did not look for a school offering weekend lessons in Russian.  

    The time also came when he was quite certain he did not remember any Russian, although my brother-in-law maintains a fantasy that he heard teenage Yasik talking up some visiting, and very pretty, Russian girls at a hockey game.

    And yes, long term and for that matter even short term, that was/is a loss for Yasik.  If at some point in his life he has the opportunity to spend time with his half-brother and half-sister in Russia, any connection of depth will be hampered by the need for a translator.

    Religion: 

    Yasik may have had some experience with the Russian Orthodox church. One in Rybinsk has been around for quite a while, if 1697 qualifies.  That it is still there speaks to a long and deep partnership between the church and the government.  

    Dave and I, like many Canadians of our generation, had moved away from organized religion into a less structured belief in God.  Some of this generation move back into religion for a stable social world for their children but we could not see any viable reason to make such a choice.  We played together on Sundays.

    And we were not particularly unusual in our casual attitude to Yasik’s heritage.  John Brooks in The Girl Behind the Door:

    Casey never showed much curiosity during [conversations about her origin story].  She never asked about her birth mother, whether she had siblings or who her birth father could have been.  Much to [her Polish-origin adoptive mother’s] dismay, she had little interest in Polish culture, never watched the hours of video [her adoptive parents] shot during [their] trip [to adopt her in Poland], and when asked if she wanted to meet her birth mother someday waved [them] off, annoyed…. As time passed, the orphanage became a distant memory.  [The adoptive father] hoped it had been completely erased from Casey’s consciousness.  She was a member of [their] family now – no different from a biological child in [their] minds …. But in truth, [they] had no idea how [their] words resonated in her sharp little mind.[viii]

    We cannot be certain we are making the best long-term decisions when we don’t offer more access to our child’s first heritage. Maurice Mierau’ father was born in Ukraine. It is understandable then that in Detachment: an adoption memoir Mierau writes that he and his wife enrolled their children in a Ukrainian language nursery school for a few of months and took them to a Ukrainian store for goodies.[ix] But quickly the couple were introducing birthday parties, celebrated with their Ukrainian speaking babysitter and several Ukrainian friends and buying goofy outfits for Halloween.[x]  “The only religion in [their] house since the boys arrived was Star Wars”.[xi] Within a year of their adoption, the younger son thought of Ukraine as part of a long distant babyhood and the older son said he wanted to be a Canadian.[xii]

    Nonetheless Mierau’s older son, who was adopted at 5, had no memories from before his life in an orphanage yet “he’d told [his adoptive parents] about a dream that seemed to go further back”.[xiii] In the dream an image approaches the child whom he believes is his mother but this image vanishes when the child tries to come closer to it. Would more connection to the culture of origin have helped the boy gain a sense of contact with the past or given the parents a deeper awareness of his mindset?

    This exploration of our child’s heritage has uncovered some awareness of where the Russian distrust of strangers comes from. Why did Yasik show so little of that after knowing us for only an hour or so? Had he picked up enough understanding of family that his little mind was firmly set on it? Had his mind been given enough prompting to have some sense of a ‘higher power’? Dare I say a god? Would it have been too onerous to ferret out more Russian literature from our public library?

    Footnotes


    [i] Sheldon K. M., Titova L., Gordeeva T. O., Osin E. N., Lyubomirsky S., Bogomaz S.

    “Russians Inhibit the Expression of Happiness to Strangers: Testing a Display Rule Model”

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017. Vol. 48. No. 5. P. 718–733.

    [ii]  Bosco-Ruggiero, MA, Gloria Russo Wassell, MS, LLMHC and Victor Groza, PhD. Adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children er age four. New Horizon Press,2014, 82.

    [iii] Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002, 151.

    [iv] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 102,103.

    [v] Sheldon K. M., Titova L., Gordeeva T. O., Osin E. N., Lyubomirsky S., Bogomaz S.

    “Russians Inhibit the Expression of Happiness to Strangers: Testing a Display Rule Model”

    Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology. 2017. Vol. 48. No. 5. P. 718–733.

    [vi] Bosco-Ruggiero, MA, Gloria Russo Wassell, MS, LLMHC and Victor Groza, PhD. Adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children over age four. New Horizon Press, 2014, 64.

    [vii] Hidden Potential: the science of achieving greater things by Adam Grant suggests that “kids tend to absorb foreign languages faster than adults.” (55)

    [viii] Brooks, John. The Girl Behind the Door: a father’s quest to understand his daughter’s suicide. Scribner, 2016, 55,56.

    [ix] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 103.

    [x] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 131.

    [xi] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 161.

    [xii]Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 133.

    [xiii] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 176.

  • Set and Setting: Physical

    In my mid-teens I was on a train coming from Edmonton and headed to my home in the Fraser Valley for the Christmas holidays. I’d fallen asleep and woke in the early morning as the train was pulling into the Blue River station which was right up against a mountain. That mountain assured me that I was again surrounded by mountains; my entire body slipped into its comfort zone. I was home. My aunt, on the other hand, a lifelong prairie woman, found it hard to breathe when she visited us in Chilliwack.  Back on the ‘bald prairie’ she was home. In Yasik’s mind, what is ‘home’?

    The physical worlds Yasik inhabited

    Yasik began life in a small village, Ermakovo, in the Rybinskiy district in the Yaroslavl oblast.

    Yermakovo or Ermakovo was/is a small village of around 2,000 people within the larger population of Rybinsk, altogether around 200,000, even in the 1990s.

    Yasik’s bio sister’s family sent us the two following pictures, taken on their visit to Yaroslavl a few years ago. Yasik’s family lived in an apartment that may be one the buildings in these pictures.  Perhaps this was much as it looked in the 1990s. Perhaps by this time it was an abandoned building in need of much repair.

    When the social services took Yasik from the apartment around his first birthday, they first placed him in one of the hospitals, maybe in Rybinsk, maybe in Yaroslavl, and maybe one that offered pediatric care. Whether Rybinsk or Yaroslavl, because it was the early 1990s all over Russia, the hospital would have been struggling with overcrowding and basic medical shortages.

    By the time he was two, he was living in an orphanage for young children.  The orphanage seemed to be off a dirt road, back a bit of beyond.  Perhaps similar to the one pictured, a Yaroslavl orphanage in later decades.

    There was a piece at the side of the house that looked worn enough to likely have been a playground. It reminds me of how Tony describes the playground of his orphanage in 1930s Saskatoon (A Canadian Story of Adoption in the 1930s).

    On any outing he would have been part of at the orphanage, it would have been hard to miss at least a glimpse of the Volga River. The longest river in Russia and in Europe, it runs through the entire oblast. The land on either side of this river all through the Yaroslavl oblast was a mix of urban and rural, farm and forest, though with birch and aspen, it looks more like central and northern prairies. It feels more like the prairies, as well, with warmer warm and colder cold seasons.

    A plane ride and he entered a city of roughly 50,000 but so closely tied to a larger urban region, it took a moment to think which city we were in on any outing. We had a comparable river running through it but instead of aspens and a more prairie look, we were surrounded by mountains.  Our climate saw more rain but much less snow.

    Whether any of that registered with Yasik, our 50s era home with a small backyard, did.  After just three hours in his new home, when Dave wanted to simply rearrange parking, Yasik thought he was being made to leave this home. He howled.

    Our background playground wasn’t scruffy; it was non-existent as neither Dave nor I had yet given much thought to the yard.  But now we had Yasik. We had a yard and we needed to see what we could do.  Or Yasik very quickly, very naturally, rearranged our thinking and awareness of what might please him.  Or we fell back on what our parents did with us. Whatever… the environment our house and yard offered became kid oriented. 

    We attempted some gardening, built igloos the odd year we had sufficient snowfall and played itsy-bitsy soccer on the front lawn. The house was tucked in among a string of streets trying to be a suburb but so infused with businesses and institutions that there was little point in denying it was part of a much larger urban setting, with cars everywhere. Nonetheless Yasik learned to ride a bike in the alley between our house and the Chevron station and biked on sidewalks running alongside a street that boasted 40,000 cars a day.

    At the bottom of our little tree-lined street, on the other side of the river of traffic, the elementary school had the word ‘Community’ in its title and across from the school was a park with baseball diamonds, a swimming pool and even a creek bordered by trees and picnic tables. An hour or two out of town our bodies and minds could ‘heed the call of the wild’ with hiking or swimming in rain-forested provincial parks.

    When the city began to feel just that, a city, we moved ‘out to the country’, the bedroom city of Maple Ridge, settling into a half-acre piece bordered by muskeg, bush, trees that fringed the coastal range circling the Fraser Valley.

    The physical body Yasik inhabited

    People see my mother’s face stamped on mine. Likewise for my siblings, you can see my parents on their bodies. Yasik can see that he shares facial features with his bio-sister but it is very unlikely he will ever hear someone say, “Oh you look just like your mother” or “Yes, he looks just like his dad”.

    His birthplace though is evident. While it is disputable that there is a Slavic DNA, it is interesting that in the UK and some other places, Slavic ethnic groups are sometimes viewed as distinct cultural minorities rather than part of the dominant white majority. So DNA or not, he does carry some of the features considered Slavic: oval-face, straight nose, fair-skin, hazel eyes and blond hair that aged into sandy. All these features were fashioned into one cute little human being.

    Whatever the combination is for cuteness, it can come in handy.

    Cuteness is the signal nature sends to us that says that a creature is young, vulnerable and needs nurturing.  Seeing cuteness is usually pleasurable and cues us to interact positively with children...[i]

    But put bluntly, for Yasik, cuteness was not enough to draw his biological father and mother to dote on him. Nor was the fact that he had been put together with genes from their parents and themselves.   We know that he was found in a bed, unattended as an infant. Our child carried their genes and experienced their lack of nurture. We would be parenting a child bearing the expression of genes that were developed over generations of oppression and whose infancy was soaking in that atmosphere.  Added to this, the early, caring nurture that helps a child develop resistance to stress and encouragement of the growth hormone was lacking for Yasik.  As well, it is possible his convergent strabismus in one eye may have been inherited or come as a result of his parents’ prenatal drinking.[ii]

    We cannot therefore ignore the possibility that their lack of care was pre-natal as well as post. It is possible they were uncaring because alcohol was their ‘go to’ in the difficulties of their days. It is possible that Yasik’s mother was drinking while pregnant. It is equally possible that it mattered that his father was drinking for it is now accepted that a father’s drinking can also infect the fetus.[iii]

    I see no reason to do other than leave this section with the following for whether we know details how Yasik’s genes were developed or what epigenetics were in play with a poor start to life, we do know this:

    …[I]f stressful events occurred during certain trigger periods in a child’s life, they would leave an epigenetic imprint on that child’s genes…[iv]

    …For instance, early brain growth depends in part on diet… Brain growth slows and complexity advances less if an infant or toddler is deprived of protein. During the first three years or so, the problematic development of the malnourished child can be corrected to some extent if the child is given a better diet, with milk, meat, eggs, or other good protein sources included. Catch-up growth can then help bring the brain closer to normal size, although the child’s stature may always be short.[v]

    On Yasik’s first doctor visit he was pronounced physically fit, perhaps, because he’d built up a strong immunity to childhood diseases in his orphanage and likely because the orphanage did its best to provide a better diet.

    Days after we returned to Canada, our facilitator met us at a café to put together the post- adoption paperwork. She herself did not plan to adopt as her husband was wary of adopting a child who might not be quite as perfect as the child they had birthed. Was the direction she then moved the conversation an attempt to smooth over this admission from a cache of comments offered to new adoptive parents? She marveled at how much Yasik look like Dave, and to draw me in, she pointed out that he had my eyes.  Not a hard sell. We both have Slavic origins as well according to our histories. John Brooks and his wife wanted their girl to think she looked like Brook’s mother as a young girl.[vi]

    Why do we adopters want a child who does not have our genes to, if at all possible, appear to have them? What if the only adoption route open to us at the time was China?

    Yasik was growing, pink cheeked and fortunately or unfortunately, depending on which member of the family you asked, unable to miss much school time due to illness.  Yasik, with his button nose and soft blond hair, also came into the family cute enough that on a pumpkin patch trip he so mesmerized the staff they end up leaving another child in the field, but they certainly had lots of pictures of Yasik and the pumpkins. This did not, in this case ‘manage stress’ or ‘soothe’ the other child’s mother.

    Maurice Mierau and his wife were told something similar by one of the women at the boys’ Ukrainian nursery: “Your boys are so good-looking, and that’s an asset in life, you know”.[vii] Mierau felt encouraged by the comment. 

    So there you have it. The natural environments of Yasik’s birthplace and the world he moved to at four and half shared some similarities. The bigger difference would have come in each place that was home for a short time, the apartment, the hospital, the orphanage and finally our home.  I do know that of all the places he has lived, that little house in New West meant the most to him. The word ‘home’ for him may be accompanied by a picture of the little house on Kelly Street.

    Footnotes


    [i] Perry, Bruce MD, PhD. and Maia Szalavitz. The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog: what traumatized children can teach us about loss, love and healing. Basic Books, 2017, 369-370.

    [ii] Olitsky, Scott E., MD., Errol W. Chan, MBBS, FRCOphth; Sonal Farzavandi, FRCS(Edin)

    “Strabismus: Accommodative Esotropia” American Academy of Opthamology, JAN 20, 2016

    https://www.aao.org/education/disease-review/strabismus-accommodative-esotropia

    Shah, Dr. Ritka, BDS, MBA, Dr. Fadel Husrom, MD, reviewer, Rohit Garoo, BSC, MBA, Shinta Liz Sunny, M.Tech, fact-checked  “Strabismus (Cross-Eye) In Infants: Signs, Causes & Treatment “ Mom Junction, Jun.19, 2025

    https://www.momjunction.com/articles/strabismus-in-babies-and-infants_00349137/?sem_campaign=DynPMAXMomjunction_Canada&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=23492009242&gclid=Cj0KCQjwp9vTBhCWARIsANaUrjunXHyIhHj8Ah0MGqvPzZuDnD1eEowrLgYRYg5R92V3xELei3AQjyQaAj9KEALw_wcB#what-causes-strabismus-in-babies

    Gummel, Kristina and Jan Ygge    “Ophthalmologic Findings in Russian Children with Fetal Alcohol Syndrome”  European Journal of Ophthalmology Volume 23, Issue 6 https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5301/ejo.5000296

    [iii] https://jheor.org/post/2235-new-research-points-to-dad-s-drinking-as-a-significant-factor-in-fetal-alcohol-syndrome

    [iv] Bosco-Ruggiero, MA, Gloria Russo Wassell, MS, LLMHC and Victor Groza, PhD. Adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children er age four. New Horizon Press,2014, 64.

    Letourneau, Dr. Nicole with Justin Joschko. Scientific Parenting: what science revels about parental influence. Dundurn Press, 2013, 173.

    [v] Mercer, Jean. Thinking Critically About CHILD DEVELOPMENT: examining myths & misunderstandings, 3rd ed.  Sage Publications, 2016, 156.

    [vi] Brooks, John. The Girl Behind the Door: a father’s quest to understand his daughter’s suicide. Scribner, 2016, 56.

    Gray, Deborah D. Attaching in Adoption: practical tools for today’s parents. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 2002, 151.

    [vii] Mierau, Maurice. Detachment: an adoption memoir. Freehand Books, 2014, 103.

  • Set and Setting: Historical, Political, Economic

    Parenting an Adopted Child reminds us “that children’s lives do not begin the day they are adopted.  Regardless of the type of adoption, children have biological relatives and genetic histories of their own”[i].

    When seeking to know an adoptee’s mindset it is likely in the best interests of adopters to acquaint themselves with anything available of the child’s origins.  Though when the child is not yet 5 years old and from an unstable home in a country with bigger concerns than the life of one social orphan, there may be little information offered.

    That doesn’t mean I can’t sift the bits available to better understand the dynamics of family via adoption.

    Yasik was plucked out of a historical setting designed over centuries. With all this time, Russia had also run the gamut from monarchy to authoritarian government.  Unfortunately, all that time did not lead to ideas for a healthier economy.

    This is not about trying to compare Russian history with Canadian history, Russian politics with Canadian politics, Russian economy with Canadian economy.

    It is nonetheless worth examining for some of the history, politics and economy would be written in his genes. Some of the history, politics and economy would be impacting those genes via the nurture he received as it came through to him in the tiny world offered by his orphanage in the 1990s.

    Historical setting

    History is the narrative of human experience in time and place.  We have, as I have mentioned often, only a bare history of Yasik’s life in Russia, things adopters are now heartily encouraged to check out. Yasik was born in Rybinsk, a city within the Slavic region, Yaroslavl Oblast. Had we checked, we would have found that Yaroslavl Oblast is part of the ‘Golden Ring’ with a history that began as the birthplace of Russian statehood and developed into a craft and trade center. It is also the region where Peter the Great built a flotilla that became the foundation of the Russian navy. (Wikipedia). Dating back to the westward movement of Germanic tribes in the 5th and 6th centuries, the Slavs acquired their name and identity either because for centuries they were an enslaved people or because the word ‘Slavic’ comes from ‘slovo’ which means ‘word’ or ‘speech’ and identified Slavs as a people who spoke the same language. Either way, as I have said before, Yasik is steeped in a long Slavic story and there is every reason to appreciate and honour his history.

    Marion Crook understood this about her adopted children. When one child pulled off a “stupid prank’, someone saw it as what must be expected of an adoptee. Crook shot back that both the child’s bio-parents and adoptive parents “…are thoroughly ashamed of him at the moment!”  How dare he imply my son’s heritage was inferior!”[ii].

    Yeah but, – No but… I will add a comment from Born For Love which is focusing on the conditions in Russia as they impact children raised in orphanages there. Examining the period of Russian history from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries, Richard Hellie, a professor of history, ties that period of darkness to the present day as having “replicated itself as each generation continued to traumatize the next and build brains for reaction, not thought[GV1] ”[iii].  Just as Jewish history has marked Jews with a tendency to anxiety, Russian history has marked Russians with a sense of fatalism; suffering uplifting. Offering us some cultural preparation for our trip to Russia, our adoption facilitator shrugged while warning us against smiling in public for “We [Russians] have unsolvable problems”. Is ‘grin and bear it’ embedded in Yasik’s psyche?

    Yasik was carried through immigration to a country not yet two centuries old with a history that has rarely failed to put high school students to sleep. A country with a history played out on a landscape somewhat smaller than Russia’s but contested over much more recently.

    It is the landscape that would most impact Yasik’s new experience of history: picnics by the lake, hikes up the mountain, and long commutes to everywhere unlike the country side around Yaroslavl which was more central- Alberta-like. And the commutes themselves expressed a different history. There were the universals for a child: school, hockey rinks and soccer fields to be seen everywhere but there would be no very old monasteries and towers standing solemnly between.

    Political setting

    Those old Kremlins, monasteries and towers were the first icons along that gamut Russian governments have run from monarchies to the Soviet regime. As we witnessed during our short stay, the Soviet period shunned the ornate icons, preferring “gray concrete boxes” messaging a political ideology showcasing efficiency and standardization.

    Then the Soviet regime came undone. Could the next icon have been a tank?

    Yasik was unlikely following the news when Yeltsin ordered tanks to bomb the parliament, constitution be damned, leaving Russia fragile. The agenda he was pushing was an attempt to move from authoritarian to more democratic agendas, but it turns out showing up with tanks is not quite enough to change political agendas overnight. It all takes money and that was in short supply.

    This had both a negative and positive (depending on your point of view) ‘trickle-down effect’ on Yasik’s orphanage life.  America came to Russia’s aid offering money and business connections with the West. So while Yasik’s bio-family were destitute, and orphanages had limited budgets, Russia was very open to international adoption.

    The reader is left to decide.  Are international adoptions in aid of a struggling country a viable option or the kidnap of Mother Russia’s future?

    Meanwhile, whether Yasik knew a quasi-democracy from a constitutional democracy or not, he now moved to Canada which, for a mere 130 years at the time of Yasik’s arrival, had stuck with a constitution based on democracy.

    Dave and I would be his guides into a good democratic Canadian mindset. When Yasik was yet well below the voting age, we would take him with us to get up close and personal with his right to vote for candidates offering the Canadian version of a choice from left to right. We wanted him to see we were not squandering our democratic right to vote. However, … we did not always do our homework beforehand, so what the heck, we would let Yasik choose for us.

    Economic setting

    However Yeltsin understood democracy, he too may not have done all his homework. At about the time Yasik was born, in the 1990s, Russia’s economic classification was (the now abandoned term, Second World) or Transition Economy with Lower-Middle class incomes. On the advice of Western economists, he instituted ‘shock therapy’, sudden and radical transition to free-market policies, flipping on the switch for a wild roller coaster ride. This may be why Yasik’s parents, while working at a factory, were being paid in food and china they were free to peddle, why poverty was evident everywhere. Russia’s reputation as a poor country became such a given assumption in the pool of common knowledge that even Jennifer Traig, in her book on hypochondria, Well Enough Alone, uses Russia as an example of somewhere you might expect to find people with bad teeth. She is writing of her own gray-coloured tooth, and wonders how the tooth turned on her. “I’d known other people with discolored teeth, but they’d always had a story. They’d fallen face-first into a tree, or grown up in Russia”.[iv]

    Considering that Yasik was given over to us with not one item he might have called his own, we can assume that he was living below the poverty line.  His parents had left him nothing; the orphanage would not let him take anything. 

    But did that necessarily mean that Yasik had a sense of deprivation in the orphanage? Perhaps with nothing to compare and three squares a day, he was unconcerned about his economic state.  Yet as we packed for the return trip to Canada, we found he had been hiding his toys, a kind of hoarding common among institutionalized children.

    When we landed in Vancouver we may have been at the airport for almost an hour. The drive to our home in new Westminster may have taken about an hour. Sitting down with family for a meal may have taken an hour. So maybe three hours after landing in Canada, Yasik was showered with more gifts than, we assume, he had been given in his first four years. He was now in (the now abandoned term, a First World) or Developed Nation.

    Adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children over age four reminds adopters: “Remember your child has gone through many losses; the loss of their biological family, the loss of caretakers and friends, the loss of culture, foods, familiar smells, sights etc. They are sometimes overwhelmed when they come to their new family and home…”[v]

    How does a child with too small shoes comprehend shoes that fit, clothes of his own, and toys, lots of toys of his own?

    Overwhelmed Yasik may have been, but as Daniel Gilbert, a social psychologist, reminds his readers in Stumbling On Happiness, moving farther up the money scale doesn’t make a lot of happiness difference. Coming out of desperate poverty does.[vi]  Perhaps Yasik saw a child’s reason for shifting his mindset from an adaptation to his economic situation in Russia to happy adaptation to his new economy.

    Yasik defined his economic state this way: he said he got all he wanted one Christmas and then wished we were rich so he could get everything he wanted. What was that about I thought at the time.

    And yeah, yeah, I know, all the adoption guides say don’t swamp him with stuff.

     Footnotes


    [i]Lancaster, Kathy, PhD. Parenting an Adopted Child, 2nd ed.  Barrons Educational Series, Inc., 2009, 37.

    [ii] Crook, Marion. Thicker than Blood: adoptive parenting in the modern world. Arsenal Pulp Press, 2016, 131.

    [iii] Szalavitz, Maia & Bruce D. Perry, MD, PhD. Born For Love: why empathy is essential – and endangered. William Morrow, 2010, 119.

    [iv] Traig, Jennifer. Well Enough Alone: a cultural history of my hypochondria. Riverhead Books, 2008, 163.

    [v] Bosco-Ruggiero, MA, Gloria Russo Wassell, MS, LLMHC and Victor Groza, PhD. Adopting older children: a practical guide to adopting and parenting children over age four. New Horizon Press,2014, 65.

    [vi] Gilbert, Daniel. Stumbling on HAPPINESS. Vintage Canada,2006, 239.


     [GV1]